Assessing the Capacity of Health Facilities to Deliver Concomitant HPV Vaccination and HPV-Based Cervical Screening Services to Vulnerable Populations – An Implementation Research Protocol
Aug 2026· Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Cente· Vol 33· 0 citations· 26 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This implementation research protocol offers a structured approach to assess the readiness of health systems to deliver combined HPV vaccination and HPV-based CC screening to vulnerable populations, and will allow the tailoring of strategies to strengthen CC prevention services.
Abstract
Introduction In Europe, cervical cancer (CC) is the third most common gynaecologic cancer, and the second among women under the age of 45. CC screening uptake is highly variable across the region, and especially low among vulnerable groups. Current evidence suggests that HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) vaccination benefits women beyond traditional adolescent vaccination age groups, and so the HPV-FASTER approach has been proposed as a strategy to accelerate the elimination of CC in Europe. The HPV-FASTER-Implement implementation research project aims to evaluate strategies that integrate HPV-based screening with concomitant HPV vaccination (HPV-FASTER approach) for vulnerable groups aged 25–45 years, including migrants and sex workers in Spain and Sweden, women living with HIV and transgender men in Denmark, incarcerated women in Romania, and women living in deprived areas in France. Methods To assess the capacity of health systems to deliver combined HPV vaccination and HPV-based screening, we adapted the Cervical Cancer Screening Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (CervScreen-SARA) protocol and tools, considering also the WHO Effective Vaccine Management tool. This implementation research protocol includes three components: a desk review of CC screening and vaccination guidelines, and policies currently in place; screening, colposcopy, and vaccination services facility visits; and interviews with key meso- and macro-level stakeholders. Triangulation of the information allows the identification of strengths and areas of improvement in implementing the HPV-FASTER approach. Conclusions This implementation research protocol offers a structured approach to assess the readiness of health systems to deliver combined HPV vaccination and HPV-based CC screening to vulnerable populations, and will allow the tailoring of strategies to strengthen CC prevention services.
Strengthening public confidence, primary care capacity, school-based delivery, and digital monitoring may help close immunization gaps and accelerate progress toward cervical cancer elimination.
Grazia Pavia, A. Quirino, N. Marascio et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
Women living with HIV (WLHIV) are at increased risk of persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer, yet cervical cancer screening uptake remains low despite regular healthcare engagement. We assessed the prevalence of high-risk HPV infection among screen-eligible WLHIV, their knowl...
Seema Singhal, P. Tanwar, Saroj Rajan et al.· The Indian journal of medica...· 0 citations
The HPV Prevention and Control Board convened its 18th technical meeting in Antwerp, Belgium (June 2025) to review the evidence on universal HPV vaccination and the role of anal cancer screening in the elimination of HPV-associated cancers. While HPV prevention has historically focused on cervical cancer in women, grow...
F. R. Burdier, L. Bruni, Anna R. Giuliano et al.· BMC Proceedings· 0 citations
INTRODUCTION
Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of preventable mortality in low- and middle-income countries despite effective screening technologies. Although the World Health Organization recommends primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, adoption and implementation remain uneven. This review examined how ce...
E. De Paepe, Sara Bertucci, A. Ssetaala et al.· Journal of Cancer Policy· 0 citations
Simple Summary Cervical cancer remains a major health problem in Nepal, yet many women do not participate in screening because of barriers such as travel, limited time, privacy concerns, and household responsibilities. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a community-based, door-to-door screening a...
Shreekrishna Maharjan, Anamika Maharjan, Kushala K. Bista et al.· Current Oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.