Skip to content

WebPageBench: Event-Level Verification and Controlled UI-Variant Generation for Web Agents

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

WebPageBench is an open framework for evaluating web agents in which every task is verified from the interface's own event log, and sensitivity to interface form can be measured under a fixed task specification.

Abstract

We present WebPageBench, an open framework for evaluating web agents in which every task is verified from the interface's own event log. Six instrumented mock sites with brand identifiers removed (a marketplace, a bookstore, a grocery service, rail ticketing, hotel search and a document cabinet) emit typed events with parameters as a user or an agent acts. A task declares the events it requires, and success is decided by matching them, with no judge model and no scraping of rendered pages. The same instrumentation supports controlled UI variation: one configuration switch re-renders a task through a different implementation of a single control while the prompt and the success conditions stay completely identical, so sensitivity to interface form can be measured under a fixed task specification. The WebPageBench release consists of three components: 152 tasks, divided into 65 canonical scenarios and 87 control variants across light/dark UI-modes; a common runner evaluated with six browser/DOM harness configurations and five screenshot-only GUI-agent families; and a public leaderboard of 24 model-harness pairs. On the public 152-task leaderboard the gap between what agents declare finished and what the log confirms reaches 41 points (one configuration declares every task finished and satisfies the conditions on 59%).

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

WebUIProof: Benchmarking WebUI Code Generators with UI-Agent Execution Harness

Evaluating WebUI code generation at scale is difficult: outputs may compile and look plausible yet fail under user interaction, and prior benchmarks largely rely on free-form prompts with static checks (build success, screenshots) that miss functional correctness. We introduce WebUIProof, an execution-oriented benchmar...

Yun-Yun Tsai, Yu-Ning Mao, Shi-Qi Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Framework and Benchmark for Code-Driven Agentic Testing in Web Development

CAT is introduced, a paradigm in which the agent writes Playwright code to drive the browser, gathers feedback, and autonomously explores web applications to uncover bugs, revealing a clear gap between current VLM capabilities and the demands of real-world testing in AI web development.

Bin Hong, Zhen-Chao Zhang, Ji-Yuan He et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Rebuild Dossier: Mechanically-Enforced Specs for Agentic App Rebuilds, and What Model-Tier Failures Reveal

An AI agent's rebuild is only as good as the process that produced it. Prior work found that once a model is strong enough, a multi-agent rebuild pipeline loses to the simplest approach: giving the model the original code and one instruction (AgentModernize). We present rebuild-dossier, an open-source tool that locks a...

P. Fawcett · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Claude Code Complete User Handbook

Thirty-four chapters run from installation to a fully verified capstone, with a governance part on managed policy, data residency and retention, observability and accessibility, and an organisational adoption maturity model is proposed.

David Soldani · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

String: An Agentic OS Where Every App Is a Markdown File

String is presented, an open-source runtime that gives this new class of software user an interface of its own and treats the job as an operating-systems problem and what three months of production use taught us.

Jookyung Song, Nojun Kwak, Simyung Chang · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.