MINT is proposed, which first trains VLA policies to remain functional under missing visual inputs, and selectively supplements missing observations using optical-flow extrapolation or an action-conditioned world model, and withdraws predicted views when they become unreliable.
Abstract
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, but they are typically developed and evaluated with all camera streams available throughout task execution. When a camera stops delivering frames during task execution, the policy must continue acting without access to subsequent observations from the missing view. Despite its practical importance, how such interruptions affect closed-loop manipulation remains insufficiently understood. To investigate this problem, we introduce MAIL-Bench, a benchmark that evaluates visual interruptions with VLA models. By interrupting different cameras at multiple stages of each policy's successful reference trajectory, MAIL-Bench measures how well policies retain their capabilities when visual inputs become unavailable. Building on this benchmark, we propose MINT, which first trains VLA policies to remain functional under missing visual inputs. At inference time, MINT selectively supplements missing observations using optical-flow extrapolation or an action-conditioned world model, and withdraws predicted views when they become unreliable. Experiments on $\pi_{0.5}$ and GR00T N1.5 show that MINT significantly improves task success under camera loss over the original models. Experiments on AgiBot G2 further demonstrate the real-robot deployment under camera loss. The benchmark is available at https://minglejiang.github.io/Mail-Bench/
Robots manipulating objects in clutter must decide not only how to act, but also where to look. Although active camera motion can expose an occluded target, it may move the robot into an initial observation-state distribution that differs from the manipulation policy's training distribution. We identify this problem as...
Jia-Wei Geng, Zhen-Yang Liu, Yu-Zheng Wu et al.· 0 citations
Visual disruptions can arise while a robot is executing a task, leaving a vision-language-action (VLA) policy to respond without knowing the disruption type or timing. We introduce Self-supervised Adaptation from Leftover Trajectories (SALT), which uses the leftover trajectory, the unexecuted part of the previous actio...
Ahin Lee, Jinwoo Seo, Youngsoo Jang et al.· 0 citations
Intention Distillation (INDI) is proposed, which distills behavior-level intent into the action decoder and organizes downstream predictions in an objective-dependent manner, and shows that action decoders benefit from explicitly modeling the semantic objective of the behavior they generate.
Actions specify what a robot should execute, but do not describe what those commands will achieve. Vision-language-action (VLA) policies nevertheless learn primarily by predicting action chunks from images, language, and state. We introduce Action--Future Coupled Effect Learning (AFCE), which makes a future-grounded ph...
Min Lin, Bo-Kai Zhou, Jian-Qi Lin et al.· 0 citations
SmoLSTM couples a frozen 256M-parameter SmolVLM backbone to a matrix-memory LSTM control layer in which observation tokens and action queries are unified in a single causal stream that is never reset throughout the entire episode, capturing the episode in a recurrent state.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong robotic manipulation performance but incur high computational costs from processing long token sequences at every control step, limiting real-time deployment. Visual token pruning offers a direct solution, as visual patches dominate the input sequence and contain consi...
Owen Du, Yang Yue, Jie Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduJul 30, 2026
From feet to fingertips — we are teaching robots intelligent whole-body control, fine dexterity, and teamwork to complete a broad range of complex tasks.