Age of Learning (AoL), a learning-state variable that measures the persistence of prediction errors over time, is introduced and suggested that temporal persistence provides a useful complementary signal for characterizing and controlling learning dynamics in imbalanced and non-stationary environments.
Abstract
Current machine learning algorithms primarily rely on instantaneous signals such as loss, margin, and prediction confidence to characterize model behavior. These signals indicate how difficult a prediction is at the current optimization step, but they do not capture how long the model has remained incorrect. We study this temporal dimension of learning and introduce Age of Learning (AoL), a learning-state variable that measures the persistence of prediction errors over time. AoL increases while an error remains unresolved and resets when a correct prediction is achieved, thereby distinguishing persistent under-learning from transient mistakes. We develop AoL-based training strategies for both offline and streaming settings. In offline learning, sample-level AoL is accumulated over training and aggregated into class-level states that guide adaptive reweighting and resampling. In streaming learning, where full historical access is unavailable, we maintain lightweight class-level AoL states using current and buffered observations. Across long-tailed classification settings, AoL improves or matches standard training baselines, with larger benefits when learning difficulty persists over time. Multi-seed streaming experiments further show reproducible gains under temporally stable imbalance. Analysis of class frequency, loss, and margin shows that AoL is related to conventional difficulty measures but captures additional information about error duration. These results suggest that temporal persistence provides a useful complementary signal for characterizing and controlling learning dynamics in imbalanced and non-stationary environments.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.