The Batch-Space Ghost (BS-Ghost) algorithm makes these scores practical inside the training loop through shared computation in batch space, without storing model-sized example gradients, and demonstrates that BGU identifies data that causally shapes final behavior.
Abstract
Attributing and controlling model behavior during training requires identifying each example's contribution quickly enough to act before the next update. However, examples in the same training batch can produce similar behavioral changes, making their individual contributions difficult to distinguish. We address this ambiguity through mutual information, accounting for interference within the batch by quantifying how much the combined behavioral change reveals about each example's contribution. We show that this mutual information is a logarithmic function of Behavioral Gradient Uniqueness (BGU). BGU gives the information measure its geometric interpretation. Our Batch-Space Ghost (BS-Ghost) algorithm makes these scores practical inside the training loop through shared computation in batch space, without storing model-sized example gradients. On a complete 1,000-example Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct workload, our BS-Ghost implementation adds 27 seconds (8.0%) to 5.5 minutes of ordinary training. Removal and retraining demonstrate that BGU identifies data that causally shapes final behavior. At each training step, signed information identifies which examples strengthen or weaken the target behavior, explaining how behavior develops during training. Signed information also enables cheap intervention during training: it predicts how changing example weights will affect behavior in the next update. We then use these predictions to choose weights that steer behavior toward a desired target. This makes our framework a practical foundation for scalable oversight and verification of training pipelines and processes, helping evaluators assess model alignment, understand how it develops during training, and guide interventions that shape ongoing learning.
Two algorithms, MAGE and SPELL, suited for reconstruction and attribution respectively, are presented, that run on existing metagradient machinery at no extra cost and demonstrate strong performance over existing baselines across training scales and measurement budgets.
Yu-Xi Chen, Hamza Golubovic, Han Tong et al.· 0 citations
Alignment does not eliminate behavioral errors in language models. Models may still refuse benign requests, call unnecessary tools, or yield to false user claims. Current methods mitigate such errors as a computation problem, and rarely explore if the desired behavior is already encoded in the model's representation. M...
Zirui He, Hai-Yan Zhao, Jing-Yu Hu et al.· 0 citations
Training data attribution for diffusion models aims to identify the training samples that influence a generated instance, but existing methods either require costly per-sample gradient computation or query-specific model optimization. Moreover, most methods attribute changes in a proxy loss rather than changes in the a...
Shi-Xuan Liu, Joan Serrà, Kin-Wai Cheuk et al.· 0 citations
Internal features in LLMs are often interpreted as mechanisms when they track a concept and their manipulation changes a related behavior. Yet steering can push a feature far outside its natural range, where its effects need not reflect the model's own computation. We examine this inference and propose an empirical con...
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) achieve strong predictive performance by conditioning on labeled demonstrations provided in context, without any parameter update. Yet how individual demonstrations shape a given prediction remains poorly understood. This gap matters in practice: the context is often assembled from what...
Yacine Benihaddadene, Milan Bhan, Eliot Dugelay et al.· 0 citations
The contribution here is systems, not a new estimator: LogIX's attribution quality, in one pass instead of two, is systems, not a new estimator: LogIX's attribution quality, in one pass instead of two.
Amit Nautiyal· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.