Skip to content

Subgroup Rank-1 Lattice for Practical High-dimensional Black-box Integral Approximation

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 71 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Estimating integrals of black-box, high-dimensional functions, from expectations and kernel mean embeddings to the softmax kernel in self-attention, is a basic subroutine in machine learning. Rank-1 lattice rules suit this setting: they query the integrand only at a fixed point set and need no gradients. When the $n$ points serve as a design matrix $X\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times d}$ for a feature map, however, computing $\Psi(X)^\top v$ or $\Psi(X)w$ for an elementwise nonlinearity $\Psi$ costs $O(nd)$ time and memory for any standard quasi-Monte Carlo point set. We study subgroup rank-1 lattices, whose Korobov generator $(1,t,\dots,t^{d-1})$ uses a scalar $t$ of fixed multiplicative order $m$. Splitting $\mathbb{F}_n^\times$ into cosets of $\langle t\rangle$ reduces both maps to short cyclic correlations evaluated by FFT, giving exact results for arbitrary $\Psi$ in $O(n\log m)$ time and $O(n)$ memory, without forming $X$. Since fixing $m$ falls outside classical component-by-component theory, we prove convergence directly: via resultants with the cyclotomic polynomial $\Phi_m$, the squared worst-case error in the Korobov space decays as $O(n^{-(\alpha-1)/(m-1)})$ for prime $m\ge d+1$, and this threshold is exact. Using the splitting of $n$ in $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_m)$, averaging over the $m-1$ admissible generators improves the constant by a factor $\Theta(m-1)$. Empirically, the subgroup lattice beats Gaussian and orthogonal random features and scrambled Sobol'and Halton points in 49 of 54 synthetic kernel-estimation settings and all 45 softmax-attention settings on nine real datasets, and builds a sample set with $d=2048$, $n\approx4.1\times10^7$ in 2.3 ms.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.