Skip to content

Bidirectional Information Flow (BIF) - A Sample Efficient Hierarchical Gaussian Process for Bayesian Optimization

May 2025 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2505.11294 · 0 citations · 26 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

B Bidirectional Information Flow is proposed, which establishes continuous two-way communication in hierarchical Gaussian Process models and proves analytically that the regret of a GP with a learned kernel scales linearly with the mismatch to the true kernel.

Abstract

Hierarchical Gaussian Process (H-GP) models divide problems into different subtasks, allowing different components to address each part, making them well-suited for problems with inherent compositional structure. However, existing H-GP frameworks typically employ one-way information sharing - either top-down or bottom-up - which limits sample efficiency and slows convergence. We propose Bidirectional Information Flow (BIF), which establishes continuous two-way communication. BIF retains the modular structure of hierarchical models-the parent conditions its own posterior on child summaries, treating them as structured priors-while introducing top-down feedback to softly decompose environment observations from the parent into sub-responses. This mutual exchange improves sample efficiency, enables robust training, and allows modular reuse of learned subtask models. We prove analytically that the regret of a GP with a learned kernel scales linearly with the mismatch to the true kernel, tightening in the hierarchical case to the sum of child-level errors. Ablation shows that removing the downward pathway collapses child $R^2$ by up to 58%. Across synthetic, neurostimulation, and HPO benchmarks, BIF achieves up to $4\times$ higher parent $R^2$ and $\sim 100\%$ AUC improvement over vanilla GPBO, and outscores all hierarchical state-of-the-art methods on child $R^2$ given the correct acquisition function, while supporting modular child transfer to novel composite tasks.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.