When Models Choose the Question: Pedagogical Constraints in Bottom-Up Multi-Agent Inquiry
TL;DR
This work introduces a bottom-up forum framework inspired by Philosophy for Children, in which language-model agents read a philosophical narrative, propose and select questions, and develop a shared conclusion without a privileged model facilitator or aggregator.
Abstract
What shapes a model-generated inquiry when no discussion question is supplied? We introduce a bottom-up forum framework inspired by Philosophy for Children, in which language-model agents read a philosophical narrative, propose and select questions, and develop a shared conclusion without a privileged model facilitator or aggregator. Across 576 forums, contrasting Aristotelian value personas interacted with a blank-slate participant receiving no value-specific instruction. The blank slate remained neutral and was selected more often for conclusions than questions. Yet inquiry narrowed in both form and source: varied initial questions increasingly became either/or alternatives, while discussion concentrated on directions already explicit in the text. Our ECO framework traces this source focus by distinguishing explicit philosophical framing, characters'modeled inquiry, and open-ended narrative material. Across analyzed chapters, participants drew most often on explicit framing. We describe this as a pedagogical constraint: freedom to formulate questions did not necessarily produce freedom from source framing.
