Skip to content

Dream-Butterfly: Configuring Embodied Conversational Guidance for Public Outdoor Mixed Reality Exhibitions

Feb 2026 · 0 citations · 65 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is argued that making interpretation available at visitors' chosen moments improves the timing of explanation in outdoor MR and shifts more work to visitors: deciding when to stop, what to ask, how deeply to engage, and when to move on.

Abstract

Public outdoor mixed reality (MR) exhibitions make guidance a spatial interaction problem: visitors need timely explanations while roaming open sites, attending to virtual artworks, hazards, bystanders, and route choices. We present Dream-Butterfly, a field-deployed embodied conversational guide for campus-scale outdoor MR exhibitions. Visitors explicitly summon the lightweight non-humanoid guide; it returns visibly to a hand-relative dialogue position and answers using retrieval-augmented responses scoped by the MR runtime to the artwork currently encountered. Within the resulting mixed guidance ecology, staff remain accountable for safety, wayfinding, device support, and contingencies. Dream-Butterfly was deployed with over 30 spatially anchored artworks across a 26,000 m$^2$ campus site, which we use as a stress case for public MR guidance under walking, field-of-view limits, route choice, bystander exposure, and safety constraints. In an in-the-wild study with 24 visitors, we compared two role arrangements: agent-default, where the embodied guide served as the default channel for artwork interpretation, and docent-default, where staff provided primary narration while the agent remained optional. Agent-default guidance was associated with more available, visitor-timed explanations, higher immersion/engagement, and stronger hedonic quality, while increasing visitors'self-curation burden around pacing, attention management, and question formulation. We argue that making interpretation available at visitors'chosen moments improves the timing of explanation in outdoor MR and shifts more work to visitors: deciding when to stop, what to ask, how deeply to engage, and when to move on.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 30, 2026

This game-playing AI is the new champ at Stratego

Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.