Sep 2026· The Paris Journal on AI & Digital Ethics· 0 citations
TL;DR
A multi-layered governance model is proposed in which the four accountability layers operate through continuous feedback loops, enabling a lifecycle-oriented approach to the responsible development and deployment of AI in the UK healthcare system.
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare reveals persistent accountability gaps shaped by system opacity, adaptive model behaviour and distributed responsibility across the clinical and technological ecosystem. As accountability becomes a central principle of AI governance, this article develops a conceptual framework and applies it to the UK’s hybrid regulatory landscape. Using the four-layer model advanced by Novelli, Taddeo, and Floridi (2024) – comprising compliance, report, oversight and enforcement – the article examines how accountability is operationalised within UK healthcare through medical device regulation, digital safety standards, transparency mechanisms and post-market monitoring. The analysis shows that although the UK has a broad assemblage of regulatory and governance tools, their fragmentation generates interconnected accountability gaps, including deficiencies in evidence generation, transparency, attribution and institutional learning. The article argues that closing these gaps requires greater interoperability between governance layers, clearer allocation of responsibilities across developers and deployers, strengthened institutional capability and more effective regulatory coordination. It therefore proposes a multi-layered governance model in which the four accountability layers operate through continuous feedback loops, enabling a lifecycle-oriented approach to the responsible development and deployment of AI in the UK healthcare system.
The proposed Lifecycle-Integrated Healthcare AI Governance Framework (LIHAG), a four-layer deployment-oriented governance model integrating technical robustness, ethical safeguards, regulatory compliance, regulatory compliance, and human oversight as interdependent dimensions of responsible AI deployment is proposed.
Shehu Mohammed, Neha Malhotra, Sourabh Kumar· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
Key applications in diagnostics, disease surveillance, supply chain management, and telemedicine are examined, highlighting how AI improves decision-making, resource allocation, and access to care and the findings suggest that the transformative potential of AI depends on strong governance frameworks, institutional cap...
The accelerating deployment of artificial intelligence systems in consequential decision-making credit scoring, employment screening, welfare eligibility, criminal justice, and healthcare has outpaced the development of legal accountability frameworks. This paper offers a comparative analysis of emerging regulatory res...
V. S· International Journal of Jud...· 0 citations
The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) across organisational and societal settings has heightened concerns about accountability, transparency, and ethical oversight. Existing governance mechanisms, including regulation and principle-based ethics frameworks, often struggle to address the scale, opacity, and...
Abstract Objective Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being rapidly adopted in healthcare, yet organisational governance often lacks the processes needed to oversee their safe and responsible use. Previous AI governance frameworks largely focus on high-level AI ethics principles, leaving healthcare organisat...
S. Freeman, Amy Wang, Sudeep Saraf et al.· BMJ digital health & AI· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.