Aug 2026· Data mining and knowledge discovery· Vol 40· 0 citations· 57 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
These models combine the periodic splitting strategy of Hoeffding Trees, which fosters ensemble diversity, with adaptive splitting mechanisms that employ change detection algorithms to identify performance decay and determine split points.
Abstract
Ensembles of decision trees are well-established methods for data stream classification. In ensemble learning, Hoeffding Trees are widely adopted as base learners, performing periodic split attempts according to the Hoeffding bound. Recent studies, however, indicate that this standard splitting mechanism lacks adaptability, while adaptive trees that trigger splits in response to performance degradation have achieved superior results. In this paper, we identify limitations in the use of adaptive-splitting decision trees as ensemble base learners, showing that change detectors often fail to promote sufficient diversity within ensembles. To address this issue, we propose two novel decision tree models, termed Hoeffding Adaptive Splitting Trees. These models combine the periodic splitting strategy of Hoeffding Trees, which fosters ensemble diversity, with adaptive splitting mechanisms that employ change detection algorithms to identify performance decay and determine split points. Experimental results demonstrate that Hoeffding Adaptive Splitting Trees enhance ensemble performance and achieve state-of-the-art results across a comprehensive evaluation, including benchmark comparisons, computational cost analysis, and concept drift adaptation.
Data-Informed Centroid Splitting (DICS), a clustering-based framework that constructs a compact and informative set of candidate splits using data-driven priors, significantly reduces the split search space for classification tasks while preserving predictive performance.
The MLIDSC introduces an automated labeling mechanism that eliminates the need for prior parameter assumptions and uses a novel weighted scheme that combines the imbalance ratio and the importance of individual instances at a given time, ensuring a focus on critical data points.
Bohnishikhan Halder, K. M. Azharul Hasan, Md. Manjur Ahmed· Applied intelligence (Boston...· 0 citations
A look-ahead tree-building method that evaluates each candidate split by the prediction error reduction achieved after growing a conventional CART subtree below that split, and a smart look-ahead algorithm that learns downstream split values using node-level features are described.
Andrew Gao, Tian-Li Liu, Rui-Chen Han et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes the Multi-Branch Neural Decision Tree with Adaptive Pruning (MBNDT), a single axis-aligned tree trained end-to-end with differentiable multi-way splits that achieves the best average rank and mean balanced accuracy among depth-constrained single-tree baselines.
H. Park, Jeonghoon Choi, Juseong Kim et al.· 0 citations
An Adaptive Ensemble Learning (AEL) framework that addresses this small-n-large-p regime through three coupled mechanisms, and was evaluated on six benchmark high-dimensional datasets containing between 617 and 12,600 features.
Porwal Rabins· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
Double descent is commonly studied by scaling an explicit capacity parameter, such as neural-network width. For gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs), however, an analogous single-axis capacity parameter has not been established. We propose the number of split candidates as an operational capacity parameter for GBDT...
Ryuichi Kanoh· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.