Skip to content
Open access

Hoeffding adaptive splitting trees for data stream classification with concept drift and ensemble learning

Aug 2026 · Data mining and knowledge discovery · Vol 40 · 0 citations · 57 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

These models combine the periodic splitting strategy of Hoeffding Trees, which fosters ensemble diversity, with adaptive splitting mechanisms that employ change detection algorithms to identify performance decay and determine split points.

Abstract

Ensembles of decision trees are well-established methods for data stream classification. In ensemble learning, Hoeffding Trees are widely adopted as base learners, performing periodic split attempts according to the Hoeffding bound. Recent studies, however, indicate that this standard splitting mechanism lacks adaptability, while adaptive trees that trigger splits in response to performance degradation have achieved superior results. In this paper, we identify limitations in the use of adaptive-splitting decision trees as ensemble base learners, showing that change detectors often fail to promote sufficient diversity within ensembles. To address this issue, we propose two novel decision tree models, termed Hoeffding Adaptive Splitting Trees. These models combine the periodic splitting strategy of Hoeffding Trees, which fosters ensemble diversity, with adaptive splitting mechanisms that employ change detection algorithms to identify performance decay and determine split points. Experimental results demonstrate that Hoeffding Adaptive Splitting Trees enhance ensemble performance and achieve state-of-the-art results across a comprehensive evaluation, including benchmark comparisons, computational cost analysis, and concept drift adaptation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

DICS: Data-Informed Centroid Splitting for Decision Tree Classifiers

Data-Informed Centroid Splitting (DICS), a clustering-based framework that constructs a compact and informative set of candidate splits using data-driven priors, significantly reduces the split search space for classification tasks while preserving predictive performance.

Saifur Rahman Mazumder, Feng Yu · 0 citations
Sep 2026

MLIDSC: A self-adaptive online active learning framework for multiclass imbalanced data stream with concept drift

The MLIDSC introduces an automated labeling mechanism that eliminates the need for prior parameter assumptions and uses a novel weighted scheme that combines the imbalance ratio and the importance of individual instances at a given time, ensuring a focus on critical data points.

Bohnishikhan Halder, K. M. Azharul Hasan, Md. Manjur Ahmed · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Learned Look-Ahead Splitting Rule for CART

A look-ahead tree-building method that evaluates each candidate split by the prediction error reduction achieved after growing a conventional CART subtree below that split, and a smart look-ahead algorithm that learns downstream split values using node-level features are described.

Andrew Gao, Tian-Li Liu, Rui-Chen Han et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Adaptive Multi-Branching for Shallow Decision Tree Induction

This work proposes the Multi-Branch Neural Decision Tree with Adaptive Pruning (MBNDT), a single axis-aligned tree trained end-to-end with differentiable multi-way splits that achieves the best average rank and mean balanced accuracy among depth-constrained single-tree baselines.

H. Park, Jeonghoon Choi, Juseong Kim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Adaptive Ensemble Learning for Accurate Classification of High-Dimensional Data

An Adaptive Ensemble Learning (AEL) framework that addresses this small-n-large-p regime through three coupled mechanisms, and was evaluated on six benchmark high-dimensional datasets containing between 617 and 12,600 features.

Porwal Rabins · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Double Descent in Gradient Boosting Decision Trees via Split-Candidate Scaling

Double descent is commonly studied by scaling an explicit capacity parameter, such as neural-network width. For gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs), however, an analogous single-axis capacity parameter has not been established. We propose the number of split candidates as an operational capacity parameter for GBDT...

Ryuichi Kanoh · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.