Skip to content
Open access

A Triad Architecture for Knowledge Organization Ecosystems: Designing Explainable and Sustainable Semantic Infrastructures

Aug 2026 · Knowledge organization · Vol 53 · 0 citations · 23 references

TL;DR

A comprehensive triad-based conceptual architecture, in which fundamental knowledge units are modeled as structured entities composed of three interdependent and co-evolving layers: referential grounding, representational encoding, and procedural-relational linkage, which provides a scalable, epistemically robust foundation for building transparent, accountable, and sustainable knowledge organization infrastructures.

Abstract

Knowledge Organization Ecosystems (KOEs) represent the next evolutionary stage in the management and curation of digital knowledge, demanding conceptual models that transcend static classification and embrace dynamic, multi-actor semantic processes. This paper introduces and elaborates a comprehensive triad-based conceptual architecture, in which fundamental knowledge units are modeled as structured entities composed of three interdependent and co-evolving layers: referential grounding (Base), representational encoding (Representation), and procedural-relational linkage (Linkage). This framework is philosophically grounded in the triplet model of scientific concepts, which overcomes the limitations of reductive singlet and duplet models by capturing the asynchronous evolution of a concept’s ontic commitments, symbolic forms, and the practices that bind them. Moving beyond traditional Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs), which prioritize stable, hierarchical structures, the proposed architecture conceptualizes knowledge objects as dynamic, operationally embedded semantic entities. These entities evolve within complex digital ecosystems shaped by algorithmic mediation, collaborative curation, and institutional governance. The triad architecture directly supports semantic interoperability across distributed systems, version-managed knowledge resources that track conceptual drift, and explainable Human–Artificial Intelligence (human–AI) knowledge workflows that make semantic assumptions transparent. By aligning conceptual modeling with ontology engineering practices, knowledge graph infrastructures, and the principles of responsible AI, this paper provides a scalable, epistemically robust foundation for building transparent, accountable, and sustainable knowledge organization infrastructures. The framework is demonstrated through a detailed application scenario tracing the evolution of the ‘Open Science’ concept within the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), illustrating the model’s utility for analyzing and designing real-world semantic infrastructures. It contributes a significant theoretical advance to the study of KOEs and offers a concrete, transferable design framework for next-generation semantic infrastructures in data-intensive, AI-mediated research and cultural heritage environments.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Corporate Language Model (CLM): Transforming Tacit and Fragmented Enterprise Knowledge into a Sovereign, Auditable, and Executable Corporate Intelligence Layer

This paper introduces the Corporate Language Model (CLM), a framework transforming a firm's structured, unstructured, multimodal, and tacit knowledge into an ontology-grounded enterprise foundation upon which reasoning and governed execution are composed.

Fabricio Colvero Avini, Guilherme Trez · 0 citations
Open access 2026

CKG-P: A Prescriptive Process for Building Knowledge Graphs in a Compliance-Driven Corporate Environment

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have become increasingly critical in enterprise environments; however, existing academic methodologies do not always explicitly address requirements such as governance, infrastructure scalability, modularity, and integration with legacy systems. This paper examines limitations in the explicit cov...

José Alberto Sousa Torres, D. A. da Silva, R. de Oliveira Albuquerque et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Meta-Books: Restructuring Organisational Knowledge for Agentic AI Reasoning

The paper’s most distinctive argument is that meta-books are the first organisational KM framework explicitly aligned with the cognitive architecture of human learning — integrating schema theory, cognitive load theory, dual coding, retrieval practice, the spacing effect, meaningful learning, and connectionist neurosci...

Sima Fatemipour · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Knowledge Management Systems in the Age of Generative AI: Rethinking Knowledge Processes

The paper concludes that the future of KMS lies not in more sophisticated repositories, but in intelligent systems capable of dynamic codification, contextual reasoning, and continuous organisational learning, redefining the balance between human and machine agency in organisational knowledge processes.

A. Antonova, Dilyan Georgiev, Anikó Csepregi · 0 citations
#generative ai Sep 2026

Algorithmic epistemic authority and the degradation of organizational knowledge: how generative AI breaks the provenance structure of knowledge management systems

The observation–knowledge nexus and AEA are introduced as KM constructs distinct from automation bias and prior algorithmic authority, and translates them into governance interventions.

Ajit Kumar · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Knowledge graphs as epistemic devices: the Experiments in Art and Technology case study

This paper presents the E.A.T. Knowledge Graph, a linked open data project representing the collaborative networks, experimental artworks, and technological innovations of Experiments in Art and Technology (E.A.T.), a pioneering initiative at the intersection of art, science, and engineering founded in 1966. Focusing p...

M. Cristina Pattuelli, Matthew Miller, A. Kaplan · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.