This Perspective argues that neuromorphic engineering should be defined neither by resemblance to biological components nor by any particular device, signal representation, or substrate, and develops a set of design principles for neuromorphic systems.
Abstract
Neuromorphic engineering began with the idea that the physical behavior of a system could itself be used for computation, taking inspiration from the way nervous systems sense, adapt, and evolve in time. The field has since expanded far beyond its early analog circuits to include event-based sensors, spiking processors, emerging memory devices, mixed-signal systems, and large-scale neural accelerators. With this expansion, however, the meaning of neuromorphic has become increasingly broad. In this Perspective, we argue that neuromorphic engineering should be defined neither by resemblance to biological components nor by any particular device, signal representation, or substrate. Its potential lies in identifying computational principles in biological systems and translating them into the organization and dynamics of artificial machines. A system is truly neuromorphic when the invoked biological or physical principle plays a causal, design-relevant role in how information is represented, how state evolves, or what capability the complete system achieves. We develop this view across sensing, collective computation, memory, learning, and interaction. Adaptation, nonlinear dynamics, attractor structure, variability, and closed-loop action illustrate how computation can be embedded in a machine's evolving physical state. From these examples, we identify a set of design principles for neuromorphic systems. As neuromorphic engineering moves toward wider deployment, this perspective shifts the central question from how closely machines resemble nervous systems to what computation becomes possible when their principles are understood and deliberately translated into new machines.
The view taken here is that brain-inspired computing is heading toward a hybrid future: conventional digital processors will keep doing what they do best, while event-driven and in-memory accelerators take over the workloads where they have a genuine edge.
Jisna C. Jeejo, Habeeba M. A.· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
Neuromorphic computing is a computer-system design approach inspired by the structure and information-processing principles of biological neural systems. Unlike conventional von Neumann architectures, neuromorphic systems integrate computation and memory more closely and exploit event-driven communication, sparse activ...
Moses Adeolu Agoi, Oluwanifemi Opeyemi Agoi· International Journal of Ele...· 0 citations
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) into edge devices, autonomous systems, intelligent sensors, robotics, healthcare platforms, and pervasive Internet-of-Things environments has exposed fundamental limitations in conventional computing architectures. Although contemporary deep neural networks achieve re...
Naveen Kumar, Achyutanand Mishra, Ravi Ranjan et al.· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
The explosive growth of artificial intelligence (AI), edge computing, and brain-inspired algorithms has spurred the development of neuromorphic systems that mimic biological information processing. Achieving such functionality at the hardware level requires materials that exhibit neuron- and synapse-like behaviors in a...
Abdullah Marzouq Alharbi· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
Inspired by the key elements and principles in the brain, photonic neuromorphic computing shows great potential for building next-generation intelligent processing systems with high parallelism, low latency, low power consumption, and self-learning capabilities. While summarizing significant advances in this field, thi...
Dun Lan, Bo-Wen Ma, Yukun Ji et al.· PhotoniX· 1 citation