Skip to content
Preprint

Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The limitations of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) with respect to insufficient evaluation are illustrated through the DetoxAI image recognition system for bias detection and concept unlearning and methods for adapting explanations to evolving data streams with concept drift are explored.

Abstract

This paper addresses the limitations of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) with respect to insufficient evaluation. They are illustrated through the DetoxAI image recognition system for bias detection and concept unlearning. Then, an example of a human-grounded evaluation of methods for explaining image classification is presented. The paper further explores methods for adapting explanations to evolving data streams with concept drift. Experiences with adapting counterfactuals for this problem are discussed. Finally it is related to the challenges of tracking the co-evolution of data, models, and explanations.\footnote{This paper has been accepted for a publication in J.Nalepa (ed) Explainable AI in Space. Proceedings of EASi 2026 Workshop at IJCAI-ECAI 2026 Bremen, Springer CCIS vol 3107 (2016).}

View source

Similar papers

Consistency of Explanations in Evolving Supervised Learning Contexts

This work introduces a model-agnostic and explanation-agnostic index for quantifying the temporal consistency of automated explanations, and empirically demonstrates that the proposed index facilitates the quantification and localization of temporal instability in explanation streams.

M. Ostrowski, Katarzyna Kaczmarek-Majer, J. Alonso-Moral · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

A Synthetic Ground-Truth Framework for the Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods

A framework for the evaluation of XAI methods based on synthetic ground truth that relies on controlled interventions to generate synthetic datasets in which the importance of input components can be determined by design, allowing a comprehensive assessment of explanation methods in heterogeneous settings.

Miquel Miró-Nicolau, F. Spinnato, Riccardo Guidotti · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

SPURIOUS CORRELATIONS IN EXPLAINABLE AI: DETECTION, QUANTIFICATION AND MITIGATION

Modern explainable AI (XAI) methods are widely used to audit deep neural networks, yet a growing body of evidence shows that the very explanations they produce can be hijacked by spurious correlations - statistical shortcuts between non-causal input features (image background, demographic attributes, textual artefacts)...

Oleksandr S. Verbytskyi · 0 citations
2026

Evaluating the Robustness of Counterfactual Generating Methods for Tree-Based Ensembles

Counterfactuals (CFs) are a widely studied approach for explaining machine learning models. They aim to identify a set of minimal and meaningful perturbations in input features required to alter a prediction of a model, thereby offering insights into decision boundaries. For instance, a CF may describe the changes need...

R. Wijethunga, Vinura Galwaduge, A. Sadhu et al. · 0 citations

Human-centred approaches for generating and evaluating explainable AI across modalities

Since work on this thesis began in October 2022, artificial intelligence has become increasingly prevalent across everyday life, scientific research, and the global economy. ChatGPT was released the following month and, by 2026, had more than one billion weekly users. In 2024, computer scientists were among the recipie...

James Hinns · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.