Sustainability Education (SE) is a complex pedagogical challenge that involves multiple disciplines and requires consensus on the content to be prioritized for citizenship education. Consensus-building on such complex issues can be effectively achieved through the Delphi technique, which relies on an anonymous panel of experts providing assessments through an iterative process. This study employed a modified Delphi method to develop a core curriculum for SE, tailored for non-specialist students at the pre-university or undergraduate level. The process involved two stages: first, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 experts to generate a list of key topics; subsequently, a questionnaire was administered using a ten-point Likert scale covering 59 key concepts, organized by conceptual area. The second panel, consisting of 40 professors from 10 departments at the University of Trento, evaluated and selected the topics for the curriculum. A consensus value was calculated for each item, and concepts were ranked according to their perceived importance and level of agreement. This research aims to arrive at a collective assessment that goes beyond individual disciplinary perspectives. The results demonstrate a strong multidisciplinary consensus on foundational and action-oriented dimensions, with the highest priority assigned to environmental sustainability and systemic interdependence (mean score of 9.3 on a 10-point scale), social equity (9.1), and operational energy efficiency (8.8). Conversely, highly specialized tools, such as carbon markets (7.2) and climate psychology (7.0), were deemed less central for general education. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that experts’ disciplinary backgrounds profoundly influenced their priorities, underscoring the necessity of a truly transdisciplinary approach. The results provide a systematic foundation for the development of interdisciplinary educational programs.
Higher education is increasingly expected to cultivate the sustainability competences described by the European GreenComp framework, yet empirical evidence linking specific pedagogies to competence-specific change remains limited. This study examined whether participation in “Sibiu Impact Makers” (SIM), an interdiscipl...
Valentin Grecu, N. Panța, Lia-Alexandra Baltador-Apostol et al.· Sustainability· 1 citation
Developing teaching materials for biology teacher education requires empirical evidence that links instructional practices, learning resource needs, and students’ self-regulation. This multi-institutional mixed-methods needs analysis, situated in the Analysis phase of ADDIE, examined the empirical basis for developin...
Hilmi Hambali, H. Bancong, Sukmawati Sukmawati· Discover Sustainability· 0 citations
Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) calls for higher education institutions (HEIs) to equip graduates with the competencies needed to address complex sustainability challenges while fulfilling their Third Mission of community engagement and societal development. This study presents a small, exploratory, one-g...
Cristina Tripon· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
This article addresses the persistent gap between policy aspirations and pedagogical actualities within the Physical Science syllabus for Grades 8 and 9 by proposing an empirically grounded multi-stakeholder framework for curriculum implementation. Drawing on a qualitative critical-hermeneutic study conducted in three...
Jona Pohamba Shiwomwenyo Mushelenga, Alex Kambulu, Davy Mainde· International journal of res...· 0 citations
This paper aimed to measure the perceived contribution of general education curricula to the Sustainable Development Goals at the University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, across four content-based domains: educational, social, environmental, and economic. Although higher education is increasingly recognized as a key setting...
Haya Mroah Alsardia, K. S. Jubara, A. Elwasila et al.· Sustainability· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.