Skip to content
Review Open access

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms on CTA and TOF-MRA: Small Lesions, Error Patterns, and Human–AI Collaboration

Sep 2026 · Applied and Computational Engineering · 0 citations

TL;DR

At present, AI is more suitable as a lesion-alert tool and a second reader than as a replacement for clinicians in final diagnosis, and future research should investigate the causes of detection errors in relation to dataset composition, model design, external validation, and human–AI interaction.

Abstract

Accurate detection of intracranial aneurysms is essential for further imaging assessment, specialist referral, and clinical management. Computed tomography angiography and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography are commonly used non-invasive methods for cerebrovascular examination. However, small aneurysms may go unnoticed due to their limited size, complex vascular anatomy, and imaging artifacts. Artificial intelligence (AI) can automatically identify suspicious lesions and may improve reader performance. This review summarizes studies published between 2022 and 2026 on AI-assisted detection of intracranial aneurysms using computed tomography angiography and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. It focuses on the detection performance for small lesions, common false-positive and false-negative patterns, and the clinical value of human–AI collaboration. Current evidence suggests that artificial intelligence provides satisfactory overall detection performance. In some studies, it also improved clinicians' detection sensitivity and reading efficiency. However, aneurysms measuring ≤3 mm and some atypical lesions remain difficult to detect. Increasing model sensitivity may also result in more false-positive markings. Incorrect artificial intelligence suggestions may further lead to automation bias. At present, AI is more suitable as a lesion-alert tool and a second reader than as a replacement for clinicians in final diagnosis. Future research should investigate the causes of detection errors in relation to dataset composition, model design, external validation, and human–AI interaction. Diagnostic performance, false-positive burden, and effects on patient management should also be evaluated in real clinical settings.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Prospective Shadow-Mode Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Tool for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection on CT Angiography: Incremental Yield and Operational Impact.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the operational performance of an FDA-cleared artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for brain CT angiography (CTA) aneurysm detection and the incremental value of combining AI with radiologists. METHODS Prospective shadow-mode study of consecutive brain CTAs (November 7, 2023, to December 19, 2...

Shlomit Goldberg-Stein, Maria X. Sanmartin, Rachel Saks et al. · 0 citations

World Journal of Radiology

Manos Siderakis, Georgios Velonakis, N. Arkoudis · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.

Overall, the reviewed evidence indicates that AI has considerable potential to support the detection, risk assessment, and management of cerebral aneurysms, while emphasizing the need for standardized datasets, prospective multicenter validation, and interpretable models to enable reliable clinical adoption.

Reza Bozorgpour, P. Kim, Jacob Rammer · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection, Rupture-Risk Prediction, and Prognosis Evaluation: Recent Advances and Clinical Integration

AI is showing strong potential in supporting the management of intracranial aneurysms, however, further research is needed, particularly through multicenter and external validation, improved model explainability and robustness, and better integration of these systems into clinical workflows.

Olti Qirici, E. Enesi, Kleona Binjaku et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR FEATURE RECOGNITION AND LI-RADS CLASSIFICATION ON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE AND EXTERNAL VALIDATION

The available evidence supports AI as an adjunct for standardized feature assessment and reader support, not autonomous replacement of LI-RADS interpretation, and feature-guided systems were generally more interpretable than end-to-end category predictors.

Samuel Bento Guimarães, G. Rodrigues, Anne Katlen Damasceno Uchoa Thome et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of artificial intelligence for pulmonary embolism detection on CTPA

AI-assisted CTPA interpretation was associated with higher lesion-level sensitivity and precision and shorter reading times than physician-only interpretation, and larger prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings and assess their generalizability.

Hui-Yang Zhang, Min-Jie Dong, Hong-Bo Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.