Sep 2026· Journal of Management Studies· 0 citations· 13 references
Abstract
The author teams on this Point‐Counterpoint debate agree that the search for genetic explanations of organizational behaviours has been underwhelming – yet they have very different visions for the future of genetics in management research. The Point argues for a deeper dive into the field of genetics to ensure more precise measurement and make better causal inferences. In contrast, the Counterpoint cautions against reducing complex human behaviour to molecular causes and sees genetics as better suited to explain distal evolutionary conditions from which behaviours emerge. The introduction to this collection summarizes the core ideas in each article and their recommendations. The introduction then positions the Point‐Counterpoint debate against the broader challenge of seeking to advance management research with knowledge from a different discipline. It concludes with a call for researchers to carefully consider when and under what conditions it is warranted to search for genetic explanations, rather than uncritically embracing genetic explanations or dismissing them outright.
Genetics has emerged as a promising avenue for explaining differences in management outcomes, attracting attention from leadership, entrepreneurship, and organizational behaviour scholars. Nonetheless, the field has faced scepticism and made only limited progress, stagnating in the pursuit of a so‐called ‘management...
Ahmed Maged Nofal, M. Wolfe· Journal of Management Studie...· 0 citations
In recent years, the field of management research has witnessed the emergence of a stream of research that seeks to identify the genetic determinants of managerial, entrepreneurial, and organizational behaviour. We challenge the reductionist epistemology underpinning this genetic perspective in management research an...
Jean Clarke, Joep Cornelissen, M. Healey· Journal of Management Studie...· 0 citations
It is argued that what biologists call their first principles are better understood as elements of a Kuhnian disciplinary matrix: symbolic generalizations of narrow scope, shared models oscillating between heuristic and ontological status, community values, and above all exemplary achievements transmitted by apprentice...
Kao-Cheng Huang· London journal of research i...· 0 citations
What attitude should scientists have towards theories and theorizing? This paper criticizes one pervasive stance scientists take with regards to this question by assessing the significance of nonstandard genetic codes for Francis Crick's famous frozen accident theory (1968). When scientists engage with Crick's theory,...
Janella Baxter· Studies in history and philo...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.