Skip to content
Conference

DSS-Skills: A Decision-Workflow Taxonomy of Reusable Procedural Capabilities for Decision Support Systems

Aug 2026 · 2026 12th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA) · pp. 881-888 · 0 citations · 58 references

Abstract

Decision support systems (DSS) increasingly combine data, models, rules, workflows, and agentic tool use, but they still offer limited support for establishing the defensibility of decision outputs: framing the problem, qualifying evidence, bounding claims, generating options, comparing alternatives, and learning from outcomes. Existing agent-skill researches treat skills as reusable procedural units, but mainly classifies them by lifecycle concerns such as representation, acquisition, retrieval, selection, and evolution. This leaves a decision-function localization gap: once a skill-like procedure is embedded in a DSS, it remains unclear which part of decision-support work it externalizes and what kind of decision artifact it assumes. This paper defines DSS-skills as reusable procedural capabilities that execute recurring decision-support work under defined decision contexts, evidence requirements, judgment criteria, authority boundaries, and feedback conditions. Based on 45 core studies describing reusable procedures, workflows, agent routines, or skill-like mechanisms relevant to decision support, we develop a decision-workflow taxonomy with six primary categories and 24 functional subtypes: problem-framing, situation-sensing and evidence-integration, analytic-inference, option-generation, evaluation-and-deliberation, and execution-monitoring and learning skills. The taxonomy classifies DSS-skills by their primary decision-support function. It also highlights three cross-category challenges essential for building organizational capabilities: bounded triggering for reuse, workflow-level validity for composition, and governed feedback for revision. This framework helps design skill templates, organize workflows, and manage feedback in agent-based decision systems.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Open access Aug 2026

A Decision-centric Knowledge Architecture for Knowledge Retention

Organizations depend on expert judgement to interpret complex operational situations and maintain consistent decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, regulatory complexity and contextual variation. In SMEs as well as multinational enterprises, the reasoning structures underlying such decisions remain only parti...

Manfred Bornemann · 0 citations
Review

Strategic Integration of AI for Data ‑ Driven Decisions and Strategic Integration of AI for Data Driven Decisions and Automation in Operations Management Automation in Operations Management

This study develops an evidence-informed framework for the strategic integration of AI through a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review and design science artifact construction and offers a rigorous and practical blueprint for scalable and trustworthy AI-enabled operations.

Lordt Becklines, O. El-Gayar · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Enterprise Governance of Reusable Agentic AI Skills A Runtime Governance Framework Built on Dynamic Capability Projection and the Agent Harness as Trust Boundary

It is argued that reusable agent skills should be treated as first-class governed enterprise assets, and that the enterprise agent harness must serve as the runtime trust boundary at which a skill's authority is granted.

Sandeep Kumar Anuguthala · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Decision Engineering: Applying Lean Production Principles to the Lifecycle Decision Factory

The Army’s transformation mandate is unambiguous: deliver warfighting capability 25–30% faster. Every Tier 2 metric published in support of that mandate – days between milestones, days to complete the requirements process, days to complete contracting, days to complete testing – is really a decision throughput measurem...

Eric Alexander, Matthew Foglesong, Louis (Bill) Berklich · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Collaborative Knowledge Construction and Decision-Making Strategies Among Engineering Students Tackling Ambiguous Design Challenges

Ambiguous engineering design challenges require teams to make consequential decisions when problem boundaries, technical requirements, stakeholder priorities, and available evidence remain incomplete or contested. Such conditions make design performance dependent not only on individual technical competence but also on...

Blessing Azuka · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.