Sep 2026· International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications· pp. 1-8· 0 citations· 35 references
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies across national boundaries demands coordinated international governance to ensure sustainable, interoperable digital infrastructure. However, the current landscape of AI alliances remains fragmented, with heterogeneous standards, divergent governance models, and uneven participation from the Global South. This paper presents two complementary frameworks: (1) a Multi-Lateral Governance Model (MLGM) that structures international AI cooperation through a three-tier architecture of strategic councils, technical coordination bodies, and implementation units; and (2) a Standards Coordination Mechanism (SCM) that quantifies convergence across AI standards using a Shannon-entropy-based Standards Convergence Index (SCI). We validate these frameworks through empirical analysis of a curated dataset comprising 45 international AI alliances, employing network analysis, ANOVA-based governance comparison, Bass diffusion modeling for technology spillover, and OLS regression for Global South participation effects. Our results demonstrate that hybrid governance models yield the highest effectiveness scores, that standards convergence is increasing but remains unevenly distributed, and that multilateral alliances with strong Global South representation significantly accelerate technology transfer. We conclude with policy recommendations addressing interoperability of AI models and infrastructure, technology spillover optimization, and inclusive cooperation mechanisms for developing nations.
The SLR demonstrates that effective AI and digital platform governance demands a holistic, context-sensitive approach that actively balances efficiency with justice, innovation with accountability, and risk with public value.
Two years after the adoption of the Global Digital Compact, the gulf between the AI governance capacity of the Global North and the Global South has not narrowed; in several measurable dimensions, it has widened. The Global AI Readiness Index records a composite governance score of 55 for high-income countries against...
The article contributes to the literature on AI governance and development by introducing the concept of transnational regulatory spillovers as a driver of sustainable territorial transformation, offering relevant insights for policymakers and stakeholders navigating the global dynamics of digital transition.
Klemens Katterbauer, R. Castanho, Sema Yılmaz· RPER· 0 citations
The findings extend technology adoption research by connecting smart governance with environmental, economic, and social resilience outcomes and highlight the conditional role of institutional governance and inform differentiated policy strategies for sustainable smart city development and responsible digital transform...
Wael Alattyih, Mohammed T. Elnabwy· Sustainability· 0 citations
It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.
Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
The escalating complexity of global sustainability challenges demands a paradigmatic shift in public administration toward smart environmental governance. This science mapping review synthesizes the intellectual architecture, temporal trajectories, and conceptual density of scholarly literature surrounding digitalizati...
Syed Agung Afandi, Rizki Erdayani, Muslim Afandi et al.· JURNAL RISET PEMBANGUNAN· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.