Skip to content
Review

Judging the LLM Judges: A Human-Centric Validation of LLM-Generated Training Data for Software Retrieval

· 0 citations · 10 references

TL;DR

A lightweight quality-assessment protocol is presented for LLM-generated synthetic training data and applied to 13,579 synthetic user reviews generated from GitHub issues across four open-source Android applications, high-lighting the need for hybrid human-AI verification when synthetic data is used in security-critical retrieval pipelines.

View source

Similar papers

Capacity vs. architecture: an evaluation of SLMs for automated docstring generation

A reproducible, human-validated evaluation framework applied to 13 strategies—four architectural families crossed with four reasoning variants crossed with four reasoning variants—across three SLMs spanning 3B–14B parameters, plus targeted ablations.

Balaji Venktesh, Amsaprabhaa M, G. Sundaram · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations

This work argues that an LLM judge running in a production system is better understood as having a lifecycle: it must be built, trained, deployed, and continuously maintained as the surrounding data evolves, and each phase poses distinct technical and operational challenges.

Emma Kong, J. Tan, Ishan Gupta et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Calibration as a First-Class Criterion in LLM Evaluation

It is argued that each NLP subfield should pair its main performance metric with a calibration score and call for treating calibration as an essential property of every model rather than a niche topic.

Mario Sanz-Guerrero, Katharina von der Wense · 1 citation
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

LLJ Cards: Best practices for the Use of LLMs as Judges

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a popular alternative for evaluation. Often referred to as LLMs as judges (LLJs), these systems have been widely adopted by researchers and practitioners across a broad range of measurement tasks, driven by their strong performance, scalability, and cost-eff...

Khaoula Chehbouni, Melina Medjdoub, Florian Carichon et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

JudgeStealer: Extracting LLM Judging Capabilities across Evaluation Protocols

JUDGESTEALER is proposed, the first query-efficient model extraction framework for replicating judging capabilities across pointwise scoring, pairwise comparison, and listwise ranking protocols and demonstrates robustness against representative extraction defenses.

Chen Chen, Yao-Lin Chen, Xue-Han Sun et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

LLMVul: A Vulnerability-Labeled Dataset of LLM-Generated C/C++ Functions from Real Production Repositories

LLMVul, a vulnerability-labeled dataset of LLM-generated C/C++ functions mined from real production repositories, enables reproducible research on vulnerability detection, security evaluation of LLM-generated code, and analysis of vulnerability patterns in AI-assisted software development.

Mohammad Farhad, Shuvalaxmi Dass · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.