Skip to content
Review Open access

Intraoperative Hypotension — From Blood Pressure Thresholds to Individualized Hemodynamic Management: Current State of Knowledge

Sep 2026 · Quality in Sport · 0 citations

TL;DR

Current evidence on the consequences, monitoring, risk assessment, and management of intraoperative hypotension, with particular attention to individualized hemodynamic management, is examined, with particular attention to individualized hemodynamic management.

Abstract

Introduction and Purpose. Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is common during non-cardiac surgery and has been associated with postoperative organ injury. However, definitions vary between studies, arterial pressure alone does not identify the underlying hemodynamic disturbance, and the optimal blood pressure target remains uncertain. This review examines current evidence on the consequences, monitoring, risk assessment, and management of IOH, with particular attention to individualized hemodynamic management. Materials and Methods. A structured PubMed/MEDLINE search was performed, with the final search completed on 16 August 2026. Studies published mainly between January 2015 and August 2026 were considered, including randomized and observational studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and current perioperative guidelines and consensus statements. Results. Deeper and longer IOH is associated with greater postoperative risk, particularly acute kidney injury and myocardial injury, although these associations do not establish causality. Pragmatic MAP thresholds remain clinically useful, but no optimal target has been identified for all patients. Current recommendations favour cause-directed treatment. Continuous and predictive monitoring can reduce hypotension exposure, but improved blood pressure control has not consistently translated into better patient-centred outcomes. Conclusions. IOH cannot be interpreted from a single blood pressure value alone. Management should consider the severity and duration of hypotension, its likely hemodynamic cause, and patient risk. Further studies are needed to determine which patients benefit from individualized monitoring and treatment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review

QUALITY IN SPORT

M. Bochnak · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Intraoperative Hypotension and Its Impact on Cardiac Outcomes after Major Arterial Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background: IOH has been recognized to represent one important, potentially modifiable intraoperative risk factor for patients undergoing major arterial vascular surgery with possible influences for resulting cardiac morbidity and mortality. Although there are improvements with respect to monitoring and managing hemody...

Majed Abdul Karim Rahal, M. El Nasri, Mayar Mashoor Alharbi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Intraoperative blood pressure management strategies and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Current recommendations for intraoperative blood pressure management suggest maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) at ≥ 60–65 mmHg to avoid hypotension. However, controversy remains regarding whether higher or individualized MAP targets improve clinically important outcomes in surgical patients. We aimed to determin...

Zhi-Xuan Zhang, Yang Han, Chan Chen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Temporal trends in intraoperative hypotension exposure in major non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis

There was a sustained reduction in intraoperative hypotension exposure over the five-year study period, and trends remained robust in sensitivity analyses restricted to patients with continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring.

Savan P. Shah, E. McFarlane, S. Bampoe et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Comparative epidemiology of intraoperative hypotension and hypoxemia across three large retrospective cohorts.

BACKGROUND Intraoperative hypotension is associated with morbidity and mortality, but comparable evidence for intraoperative hypoxemia remains sparse. Their joint epidemiology remains unclear. METHODS We analyzed three retrospective noncardiac surgical cohorts (INSPIRE, MOVER, MSHS) totaling 165,646 cases. We defined...

Robert Chen, Andrew J. Warburton, D. Katz et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Response to Dobutamine in Septic Shock With Myocardial Dysfunction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

IMPORTANCE: Dobutamine is recommended for septic shock with myocardial dysfunction and persistent hypoperfusion despite preload and mean arterial pressure optimization; however, supporting evidence is limited, and predictors of response remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether early hemodynamic responsiveness t...

M. Tarbaghia, A. Nanah, R. Sato et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.