Does the addition of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to B-mode ultrasonography improve diagnostic accuracy for breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aug 2026· Journal of medical ultrasonics· 0 citations· 24 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Pooled diagnostic estimates were higher in studies evaluating CEUS combined with B-mode ultrasonography than in studies evaluating B-mode ultrasonography alone, particularly by increasing specificity in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to determine whether the addition of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) to B-mode ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed (MEDLINE), Ichushi, and the Cochrane Library up to July 2025. Eligible studies assessed the diagnostic performance of CEUS for suspected breast cancer, with histopathology as the reference standard. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated.
Results
Eleven studies comprising 1987 patients with 2051 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of B-mode ultrasonography alone were 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.5-89.7) and 70.8% (95%CI 60.7-79.2), respectively. For B-mode alone, the pooled DOR was 15.0 (95%CI 9.7-23.3), with an LR + of 2.95 (95% CI 2.18-3.99) and an LR - of 0.20 (95% CI 0.15-0.26). In contrast, CEUS was associated with improved pooled estimates of diagnostic performance, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 93.4% (95%CI 89.0-96.2) and a specificity of 85.8% (95%CI 80.9-89.6). The pooled DOR for CEUS was 86.3 (95%CI 48.0-155.4), with an LR + of 6.59 (95%CI 4.89-8.87) and an LR - of 0.08 (95%CI 0.05-0.13).
Conclusions
Pooled diagnostic estimates were higher in studies evaluating CEUS combined with B-mode ultrasonography than in studies evaluating B-mode ultrasonography alone, particularly by increasing specificity in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. However, these findings are based on indirect comparisons and should be interpreted with caution.
Background This network meta-analysis (NMA) intends to fully assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with other imaging techniques in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules (TNs), and provide clinical guidance. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane up to Octo...
Qing Xie, Zhuo-Shi Yang, Yue Sun et al.· Frontiers in Endocrinology· 0 citations
The integration of TI-RADS and elastography contributes significantly to improved diagnostic accuracy with a reduction in false-positive outcomes, thereby supporting a selective and evidence-based biopsy strategy.
Noraiz Ali, Mahrukh Latif, Muhammad Zubair et al.· Journal of Diagnostic Medica...· 0 citations
The combined use of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging provides the highest diagnostic performance, reduces false negatives, and is suitable for staging and high genetic risk evaluation.
Hugo Ricardo De, Oliveira Sassi, G. Miranda et al.· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
The present study aims to assess the clinical utility of super resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SR CEUS) in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules for which fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is recommended according to the ACR guidelines, thereby providing incremental value beyond conventiona...
Tiantong Zhu, Yu-Qing Zhang, Yue Qi et al.· Ultrasound in Medicine and B...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
To develop and validate a breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) based on conventional ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) to stratify the malignancy risk of breast lesions and reduce unnecessary punctures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective multicenter study evaluated 146...
Jia-Yi Qiu, Heng-Qi Zhang, Hui Liu et al.· Ultrasound in Medicine and B...· 0 citations