Skip to content
Meta-analysis Open access

The clinical value of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to radiotherapy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aug 2026 · Annals medicus · Vol 58 · 0 citations · 43 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Adding immunotherapy to radiotherapy can provide significant clinical benefits for patients with NSCLC and cervical cancer, and the addition of these ICIs in the adjuvant stage is supported.

Abstract

Abstract Background While several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have explored the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for patients undergoing radiotherapy, studies systematically assessing the clinical value of such interventions are lacking. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant RCTs of cancers that received ICIs plus radiotherapy or radiotherapy. Eligible studies were those published in English as of 14 April 2024. Two independent reviewers screened the included studies and extracted relevant data, then selected the random or fixed-effects model based on the I2 statistic. The main outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Stratified analysis was performed based on cancer type, ICI type, and the timing of ICI addition. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024551008). Results 15 RCTs with 7947 patients were included. Pooled HRs were 0.865 (95% CI, 0.730–1.000; I2 = 72.1%) for OS and 0.799 (0.677–0.922; I2 = 82.0%) for PFS in cancer patients. In cancer types, adding immunotherapy to radiotherapy significantly improved patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (OS: 0.544 [0.371–0.717]; PFS: 0.527 [0.438–0.617]) and cervical cancer (OS: 0.722 [0.578–0.867] and PFS: 0.754 [95%CI, 0.621–0.887]). Regarding the ICIs schedule, adjuvant ICI therapy with pooled HRs was 0.742 (0.649–0.834) for OS and 0.638 (0.579–0.697) for PFS. In addition, the pooled ORs for the incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related and immune-related adverse events were 1.227 (1.059–1.421; I2 = 71.9%) and 2.217 (1.743–2.821; I2 = 74.0%), respectively. Conclusion Adding immunotherapy to radiotherapy can provide significant clinical benefits for patients with NSCLC and cervical cancer, and the addition of these ICIs in the adjuvant stage is supported.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic review synthesizes the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI-based therapies compared to chemotherapy. Metho...

Moontasir Ahmed, S. Newaz, J. Tina et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Advancements in Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Meta‐Analysis of Clinical Trial Outcomes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed therapeutic selections for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, comparative evidence versus chemotherapy through ICI monotherapy and chemo‐immunotherapy combination strategies remains incomplete. For this purpose, we conducted a meta‐analysis of randomiz...

Ying-Jie Jiao, Yan Zhao · 0 citations
Meta-analysis Aug 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The findings indicate that immune checkpoint inhibitors represent a potentially effective treatment option for patients with cervical cancer; however, their safety profile warrants careful consideration.

Yuan-Yuan Li, Song-Yi Wang, Yi-Rui Mai et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have improved pathological responses in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but the magnitude of benefit and associated toxicity remain variable across trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of...

Jia-Le Li, Pei-Tao Wu, Jing-Shu Song et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The prognostic value of the pan-immune-inflammation value in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show substantial therapeutic potential in advanced or metastatic solid malignancies, yet optimization of clinical benefit remains an unmet need. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the pretreatment pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) as a prognostic biomarker...

Le Yang, Ziqian Zhao, Munawar Anwar et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Dec 2024

Addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to standard of care chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Preliminary findings from this study were previously published as a conference abstract (https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.IO2025-B039). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown activity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but their efficacy and safety when integrated with standard chemoradiotherapy (C...

R. Srinivasmurthy, J. Ta, S. Afifi et al. · 3 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.