Aug 2026· European Journal of General Dentistry· 0 citations· 24 references
TL;DR
For Class I angle malocclusion orthodontic treatment, alterations to the aesthetic line's impact on the upper and lower lip profiles are directly proportional to shifts in the inclination angle of U1-NA and L1-NB.
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Correcting dental malocclusion and attaining facial balance through hard and soft tissues are the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. This article aimed to analyze the impact of incisor inclination (U1-NA, L1-NB) change on facial aesthetics (aesthetic line) with extraction and non-extraction premolar teeth receiving fixed orthodontic treatment for class I angle malocclusion. Materials and Methods The study design is cross-sectional, and the research methodology is analytical and observational. This study used 38 samples, which were divided into two groups: 19 extractions and 19 non-extractions. Evaluation of pre- and posttreatment cephalometric values for the upper and lower lips relative to the aesthetic line, U1-NA and L1-NB, is documented. Statistical Analysis The normality test for data uses the Shapiro–Wilk test to ascertain the analytical applicability of the standard data distribution. The paired sample t -test was used to assess different parameters before and after treatment. The threshold for significance was a p -value < 0.05. Data were analyzed via IBM SPSS for Windows. Results There were differences in values of the aesthetic line and U1-NA and L1-NB angles between extraction and non-extraction cases ( p < 0.05). In the extraction group, there was a significant decrease in the value ( p < 0.05), while in the non-extraction group there was a slight increase in the value, which was not significant ( p > 0.05). In both groups, there was a relationship in the same direction between the U1-NA and L1-NB angle values and the aesthetic line values ( p < 0.05). Conclusion For Class I angle malocclusion orthodontic treatment, alterations to the aesthetic line's impact on the upper and lower lip profiles are directly proportional to shifts in the inclination angle of U1-NA and L1-NB. In comparison to the non-extraction group, the extraction group had substantially different aesthetic lines as well as U1-NA and L1-NB angle values.
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the craniofacial effects of non-extraction class II camouflage treatment using maxillary distalization and intermaxillary class II elastics in late adolescent patients.Methods: This retrospective study included 26 patients (20 females, 6 males; mean age: 15.2±1.3 years) with skeletal...
M. B. Kadıoğlu, Meyra Durmaz, M. Rübendiz· Anatolian Current Medical Jo...· 0 citations
Background and Objective: Facial aesthetics and self-presentation assume significant importance in modern society and augmenting interest in orthodontic treatment practices. Fixed labial, or regular, appliances, namely braces, and clear aligners are the most common orthodontic modalities, and these two vary in their ef...
Nissi Gurindapalli, Lakshmi Mani Kumari Nachu, D. Vasamsetti et al.· International Arab Journal o...· 0 citations
Background. Class III malocclusion is a complex condition involving sagittal skeletal and dental discrepancies and is often associated with a concave facial profile. In selected adult patients, orthodontic camouflage represents a non-surgical treatment option aimed primarily at improving occlusion and facial relationsh...
S. Pop, Bianca Arsintescu, Adél Ambrus et al.· Romanian Journal of Stomatol...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Developing skeletal Class III malocclusion can cause facial aesthetic issues, low self-confidence, social discomfort, and psychological distress. This study aims to evaluate dentoskeletal and psychosocial changes following early orthopedic correction of developing skeletal Class III malocclusion using the mo...
Mohasin Moyikkal, Vincy Antony, Muhamed Shaloob et al.· Journal of the World Federat...· 0 citations