Skip to content
Open access

Validation of the Danish version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR): psychometric properties, sensitivity to change, and meaningful difference.

Sep 2026 · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · pp. 1-10 · 0 citations · 33 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The Danish QPR-7 is a valid and reliable brief measure for patient-centered recovery assessment in mental health care and its invariance properties, interpretability thresholds, and low respondent burden support its usefulness in routine monitoring of individual recovery gains alongside clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Background

Validated patient-reported outcome measures are needed to assess personal recovery alongside symptom-based outcomes in mental health care. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) assesses subjective recovery aligned with CHIME processes, but no version of the QPR has previously been validated in Danish, including the widely used QPR-15 and the more recently developed QPR-7. This study assessed psychometric properties, sensitivity to change, and meaningful difference thresholds for the Danish QPR in community mental health samples.

Methods

Pooled analyses were conducted using baseline (n = 353) and follow-up (n = 234) data from adults with mental illness in Danish community mental health services. Confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance testing across subgroups, content validity, internal consistency, convergent/discriminant validity, responsiveness analyses were applied, as well as anchor-based methods (CGI-S, MANSA) to establish meaningful difference thresholds.

Results

QPR-15 showed poor unidimensional fit. QPR-7 demonstrated satisfactory fit (CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.039, RMSEA = 0.061), internal consistency, invariance across sex, age, education, mental disorder type, and over time. The data were normally distributed without floor/ceiling effects, and correlations supported convergent/discriminant validity. QPR-7 change was strongly associated with changes in quality of life. Meaningful difference values: 2.5 (small)/3.5 (moderate) points within-person; 1.5(small)/2.5 (moderate) points between-group.

Conclusion

The Danish QPR-7 is a valid and reliable brief measure for patient-centered recovery assessment in mental health care. Its invariance properties, interpretability thresholds, and low respondent burden support its usefulness in routine monitoring of individual recovery gains alongside clinical outcomes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Psychometric Properties of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) in Spain: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Metric Superiority of the 18-Item Version (RAS-18)

Background: The adoption of the recovery model in mental health creates a need for validated instruments that go beyond the assessment of clinical symptoms. The Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) is the most widely used test internationally. However, the need to balance the validity of psychological measurement with reduc...

M. I. Ruiz-Granados, Javier Herruzo-Cabrera, José Antonio Garrido Cervera et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Assessing the psychometric properties of the Symptom Checklist Five-Items (SCL-5) instrument in a clinical setting for treating intimate partner violence

Research suggests that the Symptom Checklist Five Items (SCL-5) instrument is a reliable and valid scale for assessing mental health in a range of populations. Yet, to date, the SCL-5 has not been validated in a population of perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) and their partners. Hence, the current s...

M. Nesset, Tom Palmstierna, R. Whittington et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Psychometric validation of research domain criteria, general health, and clinical-psychosocial parts of the minimum dataset of the German Center for Mental Health—informing a Delphi process

This study evaluated the latent structure and conceptual validity of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), General Health, and Clinical/Psychosocial clusters of the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Minimum Data Set (MDS). It aimed to determine whether these clusters represent interpretable constructs and demonstra...

Bernd R. Förstner, S. Böttger, Timm Seegert et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Finding salvage in standardization? Structural and longitudinal evaluation of the patient health questionnaire anxiety and depression scale in a UK representative sample.

OBJECTIVES Some research funders mandate the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) as independent measures of depression and anxiety. This study examined their independence in a UK representative sample by testing the structural validity, external validity, longitu...

J. J. Crawford, G. Adamson · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Development of the Japanese version of the Manchester short assessment of quality of life (MANSA) among people with self-reported severe mental illness

The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) is a quality-of-life (QOL) instrument developed for people with mental illness. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the MANSA for people with severe mental illness (SMI) and examine associations between individual MANSA domains and psychiatric dia...

M. Kageyama, Kayo Ichihashi, Momoko Kusaka et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Validation and reliability of the Thai version of the glasgow antipsychotic side-effect scale (GASS) in patients with schizophrenia

The Thai version of the Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale shows preliminary evidence of acceptable validity and reliability and can be appropriately used to assess antipsychotic side effects in patients with schizophrenia in both clinical practice and research settings.

Nattida Wunha, Siriprapa Maksuk, S. Pilakanta et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.