In South Asia, rapid economic growth and structural transformation intensify environmental pressures and ecological degradation with limited decoupling. This study examines how agricultural activity, natural resource dependence, and disaggregated energy use jointly influence the ecological footprint in South Asian economies from 1960 to 2024, with the effective sample limited to five countries over twenty-five years due to data availability. Based on the STIRPAT framework, this paper applies PCCE/CS-ARDL, Mean Group, and Driscoll-Kraay estimators to account for heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. The study yields three key findings. First, renewable energy robustly decreases ecological footprint (MG and DKSE), indicating that substitution effects dominate scale effects. Second, agricultural value added is not statistically significant; however, its interaction with natural resource rents is positive and significant, indicating that resource-driven agricultural expansion amplifies ecological pressure (resource curse). Third, natural resource rents alone have no significant effect, whereas non-renewable energy and population growth yield robust null results. This finding highlights the South Asian sustainability paradox: clean energy mitigates ecological stress, whereas resource-linked agricultural growth reinforces it. Thus, environmental outcomes come from interactions among agriculture, energy use, and natural resources. Therefore, effective policy requires accelerating renewable energy transitions, promoting sustainable agriculture practices, and strengthening governance of natural resource rents, thereby ensuring long-run ecological sustainability.
Understanding how globalization, energy transition, and resource dependence shape environmental pressure remains critical for resource-rich economies seeking sustainable development. This study investigates the determinants of ecological footprint per capita in the United Arab Emirates from 1992Q1 to 2020Q4 by extendin...
Forest fires have escalated alarmingly, now consuming more than double the tree cover compared to two decades ago, signaling a growing and urgent environmental crisis. This study addresses the ever increasing global concern of forest fires, focusing on sustainable economic recovery while minimizing the ecological foo...
Laxita Soontha, Mohammad Younus Bhat, A. Sofi· Land Degradation & Devel...· 0 citations
This study examines the asymmetric effects of natural resource, renewable energy, economic growth, and technology on environmental sustainability in Central Asian (CA) economies. Using panel data for Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, environmental sustainability is measured through ecolo...
Azizullah Faizi, Waheedullah Amin· Global Journal of Social and...· 0 citations
The load capacity factor (LCF), the ratio of biocapacity to the ecological footprint of consumption, measures environmental sustainability on both the supply and the demand side of the ecological ledger, making it a more complete criterion than emissions or footprints alone. This study asks whether natural resource ren...
Philip Kwesi Appartaim, Paul Ankomah Osei, Fletcher Kojo Asefua· International journal of app...· 0 citations
Climate potential productivity (CPP) in agrarian economies is frequently analysed through a purely biophysical lens, obscuring the socioeconomic pathways through which environmental degradation, human capital deficits, and energy constraints prevent actual agricultural output from realising its climate-determined ceili...
J. T. Adeyemo, Opeyemi Eunice Olagunju, G. Adigun et al.· Discover Environment· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.