Jan 2026· Case Reports in Dentistry· Vol 2026· 0 citations· 59 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Findings suggest that the combination of dynamic navigation and ultrashort implants may represent a reliable and minimally invasive treatment option for single implant rehabilitation in severely atrophic posterior maxillary sites.
Abstract
Implant rehabilitation in the posterior maxilla with severe vertical bone atrophy remains clinically challenging, particularly when bone augmentation procedures are not feasible or are refused by the patient. The use of ultrashort implants combined with dynamic navigation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative in selected cases; however, long‐term clinical evidence in the maxilla is still limited. This case report describes the 10‐year clinical and radiographic outcomes of a single 4‐mm ultrashort implant placed in the posterior maxilla using dynamic navigation technology. A 47‐year‐old nonsmoking female patient presented with a single edentulous maxillary first molar and severe vertical bone resorption (≤ 5 mm). The patient declined bone augmentation and fixed partial denture therapy. Implant placement was planned and performed under dynamic navigation guidance, followed by restoration with a single implant‐supported crown. Clinical and radiographic follow‐up was conducted regularly up to 10 years after prosthetic loading. Throughout the follow‐up period, no biological or prosthetic complications were observed. Peri‐implant soft tissues remained healthy, with no bleeding on probing or suppuration. Radiographic evaluation using standardized periapical radiographs revealed a mean marginal bone loss of 0.35 mm at 10 years. The implant‐supported crown maintained stable function and structural integrity, and the patient reported high satisfaction with the treatment outcome. Within the limitations of a single case report, these findings suggest that the combination of dynamic navigation and ultrashort implants may represent a reliable and minimally invasive treatment option for single implant rehabilitation in severely atrophic posterior maxillary sites. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and long‐term follow‐up are required to confirm the predictability and reproducibility of this approach.
Background/Objectives: This prospective case series evaluated whether modified multi-tooth posterior maxillary alveolar segment infracture without a lateral window permitted staged implant placement. Methods: Of 53 patients assessed, 8 were excluded and 25 declined; 20 eligible consenting non-smokers were enrolled cons...
R. Šmucler, Simona Dianišková, Justina-Anna Šmuclerová· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation is an established treatment for vertical bone deficiency in the posterior maxilla. Management of a chronic Schneiderian membrane defect associated with a pre-existing lateral sinus wall defect following previous sinus augmentation may present additional surgical challenges, part...
Menyar A. Ahmad· Journal of Oral Implantology· 0 citations
Background and Aim Full‐arch rehabilitation in patients with advanced maxillary atrophy has evolved considerably through the introduction of tilted and pterygoid implants combined with immediate loading protocols. At the same time, digital technologies have transformed prosthetic workflows. Nevertheless, fully digital...
Francesco Liborio, F. M. Sciarra, Emanuele Di Vita et al.· Case Reports in Dentistry· 0 citations
The clinical outcome supports current evidence indicating that osseodensification may enhance initial stability and predictability of immediate implants placed in posterior mandibular regions.
Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Jucielly Santos Lesnik de Souza, Gustavo dos Santos Coura et al.· Reports· 0 citations
Immediate implants in the posterior maxilla are often limited by reduced bone height and sinus proximity, traditionally requiring grafting. Long tilted implants engaging the palatal cortex and nasal floor may enhance stability without augmentation; however, prospective evidence for immediately loaded, digitally g...
V. Nag, M. Ramanathan, Bhavna Lokwani et al.· Dental Research Journal· 0 citations
In the present case, transverse maxillary arch form was maintained over 5 years under continued orthodontic retention, indicating that anterior-only prosthetic rehabilitation is compatible with preservation of arch form when retention is sustained.
Gizem Altundal, Sinem Gümüş, Erol Kozanoğlu et al.· Journal of Esthetic and Rest...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.