These findings suggest LVAD explant identifies a higher-risk transplant phenotype shaped by surgical burden, device-associated physiologic effects, and allocation-era transplant timing, rather than by intrinsic device-related risk alone.
Abstract
Background
Whether left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explant during heart transplantation confers additional risk remains unsettled in the contemporary allocation era.
Methods
Heart transplant recipients at a single center (January 2020-December 2024) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing multi-organ transplants, with congenital heart disease, ≥2 prior sternotomies, non-HeartMate 3 LVADs or pre-transplant ECMO were excluded. Recipients were grouped as primary sternotomy, non-LVAD redo sternotomy, or LVAD explant. Outcomes included transfusions, vasoplegia, and 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year mortality. IPTW-weighted logistic regression and Cox models assessed vasoplegia and mortality.
Results
Among 432 recipients (primary sternotomy 237; non-LVAD redo sternotomy 90; LVAD explant 105), transfusion volumes increased stepwise intraoperatively and 48 hours postoperatively (both p<0.001). Vasoplegia differed across cohorts (12.1% vs 24.3% vs 22.9%; p=0.014); after IPTW adjustment, LVAD explant remained associated with higher odds versus primary sternotomy (OR 2.2 [1.1-4.4]; p=0.03). Unadjusted survival declined across groups at 1 year (98.3% vs 93.3% vs 87.6%, p<0.001) and 2 years (95.0% vs 89.1% vs 85.2%, p=0.003). Versus primary sternotomy, LVAD explant had higher adjusted hazards of death at 1 year (HR 5.8 [1.8-19], p=0.003) and 2 years (HR 2.9 [1.3-6.7], p=0.01). In an exploratory lower-risk LVAD explant subgroup (n=37), observed mortality differences were attenuated.
Conclusions
LVAD explant during heart transplant was associated with greater transfusions, vasoplegia, and early-to-intermediate mortality compared with primary sternotomy. These findings suggest LVAD explant identifies a higher-risk transplant phenotype shaped by surgical burden, device-associated physiologic effects, and allocation-era transplant timing, rather than by intrinsic device-related risk alone.
INTRODUCTION
The use of durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) is a risk factor for severe primary graft dysfunction (sPGD). Whether the intrinsic properties of the device itself, or mediastinal reentry at the time of HTx, are responsible for this deadly complication r...
T. Nordan, M. J. Schloss, N. Tadokoro et al.· The Journal of Heart and Lun...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The role of donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at heart procurement has been extensively studied. However, there remain scarce data on how 1-year post-heart transplant (HTx) LVEF affects recipient outcomes. Our study seeks to address this gap.
METHODOLOGY
The OPTN database was analyzed for adu...
Ahad Firoz, I. Ebong, Martin Cadeiras et al.· Clinical Research in Cardiol...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
Superior survival outcomes have been reported for younger patients receiving durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in INTERMACS. We explored whether these findings extend to contemporary European practice leveraging on EUROMACS (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support)....
G. Gallone, K. Veen, A. Bernhardt et al.· European Journal of Cardio-T...· 0 citations
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explant heart transplantation represents a metabolically vulnerable population with an increased risk for renal failure and mortality. Oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER), which integrates oxygen delivery and tissue oxygen demand, may provide a physiologic marker of cumulative metabolic...
Chen-Chia Wang, M. Petrovic, A. Ahmad et al.· ASAIO journal (1992)· 0 citations
Introduction: Changes in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation system, coupled with declining donor availability, have contributed to a rising proportion of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations, particularly among patients with prior cardiac surgeries and those requiring multiple...
B. Mahesh, Dong-Ping Du, Kenny K. Nguyen et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
T-VAD was the predominant temporary RV support strategy at the authors' institution and was feasible, with favorable observed survival in this descriptive single-center experience, and was associated with significantly greater perioperative resource utilization.
Matthan Tharakan, Luis M. Quiroz, Steven C. Stroud et al.· JHLT open· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.