Skip to content
Open access

Exploratory evaluation of large language models in patient-oriented orthopedic MRI report interpretation: a two-stage study

Sep 2026 · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · 0 citations

TL;DR

Large language models show promise as auxiliary communication aids for patient-oriented orthopedic education and are associated with higher patient-rated clarity and strengthened subjective motivation to engage in clinical dialogue after AI-assisted plain-language transformation.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports for orthopedic conditions are filled with highly specialized terminology, leading to information asymmetry between clinicians and patients. Deficiencies persist in routine patient education regarding orthopedic imaging results, and a well-documented mismatch exists between physicians’ professional explanations and patients’ actual understanding of medical information. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of utilizing large language models (LLMs) to translate specialized orthopedic MRI reports into plain-language educational summaries, and to evaluate their impact on patients’ perceived comprehension and communication motivation. A prospective two-stage study design was adopted. In Stage I, two senior orthopedic surgeons evaluated 24 reports generated by six LLMs, assessing content accuracy via the Mika scale, reliability using the DISCERN tool, and objective readability. In Stage II, a total of 60 patients were randomly divided into three groups: conventional control group, Baichuan M3 group and Gemini 3.1 Pro group. We further compared changes in patients’ subjective comprehension and behavioral motivation after receiving AI-assisted interpretation. Stage I results showed that Baichuan M3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro delivered the best overall performance. Their accuracy (median Mika score = 1.0) and reliability were significantly superior to other models ( P  < 0.001). Stage II demonstrated that baseline characteristics were comparable across the three groups ( P  > 0.05). Following the AI intervention, both the Baichuan M3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro groups exhibited significant within-subject improvements compared to their respective baselines (all P  < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in the overall utility between the two AI models ( P  > 0.05). Among all assessed domains, the dimension of action guidance and motivation demonstrated the most pronounced enhancement, with mean scores increasing by 2.5–2.8 points. LLMs show promise as auxiliary communication aids for patient-oriented orthopedic education. AI-assisted plain-language transformation is associated with higher patient-rated clarity and strengthened subjective motivation to engage in clinical dialogue. Given that imaging reports alone cannot replace comprehensive clinical reasoning, such tools should be deployed under strict safety guardrails to assist—not replace—physician-patient communication.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Evaluation of a large language model for clinician-facing preoperative cost-communication preparation in total knee arthroplasty

The LLM showed offline potential for identifying cost-communication cues and generating clinician-facing preparation checklists for TKA, but content omissions, quality variation, safety risks, and substantive cross-run variability remained.

Zebing Ma, Liping Xue, Gong-Hui Jian et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Evaluating large language models in patient education: a comparative analysis addressing frequently asked questions in peri-acetabular osteotomy.

There may be significant differences in how effectively LLMs support patients with surgical queries, particularly in areas needing detailed explanation, and usually required minimal clarification in areas needing detailed explanation.

T. Davis, B. Guevel, K. Logishetty et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Large language models for patient-facing pathology report interpretation: A scoping review.

LLM-based patient-facing pathology report interpretation shows potential to bridge specialist pathology language and patient communication, and evaluation should extend beyond readability to include fidelity to the original pathology report, patient understanding, safety, and usability.

Chen Wang, Jie Hao, Si-Jia Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Comparative evaluation of large language models in interpreting the scientific literature on intraoral scanners across varying input levels.

Evaluating the response accuracy of 2 advanced large language models found the Gemini-3.0 Flash responses excelled in highly structured, direct-response questions to relevance, clarity, and closeness to the article, whereas the ChatGPT-5.2 response demonstrated greater scientific accuracy at all levels and performed be...

Pranay Jain, F. R, A. V et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Feasibility and expert evaluation of a medical large language model in an interdisciplinary clinical board

Interdisciplinary clinical boards (ICB) on chronic inflammatory diseases discuss complicated and multidisciplinary cases with inflammatory conditions among experts in their discipline. Medically specialized large language models (LLMs) are finding increasingly widespread use among physicians to answer clinical question...

M. Ronicke, L. Sollfrank, Ioannis Sagonas et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.