A Physics-Informed Graph Attention Network (PIGAT) surrogate model for power flow prediction, which captures the topological relationships among buses and combines nodal power balance and system active power conservation constraints to improve the physical consistency of the predictions.
Abstract
With the increasing penetration of electric vehicles (EVs) and distributed energy resources, source-load uncertainty, spatiotemporal variability, and nonlinear coupling make rapid and accurate assessment of operating states more difficult in active distribution networks. This paper proposes a Physics-Informed Graph Attention Network (PIGAT) surrogate model for power flow prediction. PV output is represented by a Beta distribution, and EV charging loads are generated by category-based Monte Carlo sampling. The graph attention mechanism captures the topological relationships among buses. A physics-informed loss combines nodal power balance and system active power conservation constraints to improve the physical consistency of the predictions. The model maps source-load inputs to bus voltage magnitudes, voltage phase angles, and system active power loss. Tests on the IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus systems evaluate prediction accuracy, physical consistency, inference time, performance under light- and heavy-load conditions, and performance with limited training data. On the IEEE 33-bus system, the MAE and RMSE of bus voltage magnitude predictions are below 5 × 10−4 p.u.; the MAE and RMSE of system active power loss predictions are 0.635 and 0.712 kW, respectively; and the MAE of the active power conservation deviation is 0.862 kW. The pure forward-pass inference time is 1.58 ms, compared with 8.19 ms for MATPOWER; including the optional physics-residual check, the total evaluation time is 2.64 ms.
The increasing penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs), the growing usage of power electronic devices, and the extensive replacement of overhead lines by underground cables have made the reactive power management at the transmission-distribution (T-D) interface more challenging. Alternating current optimal p...
Anna Shuvarina, J. Morren, J. G. Slootweg et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
The large-scale integration of distributed photovoltaic (PV) generation and electric vehicles (EVs) increases uncertainty in distribution-network source and load conditions and complicates system operation. Conventional optimization methods based on iterative solutions and day-ahead forecasts may not meet the real-time...
Xue-Kai Hu, Shi-Wei Xue, Zi-Xiao Fan et al.· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
To address inaccuracies in reactive power optimization caused by the absence of integrated distributed photovoltaic (PV) in active distribution network (ADN), this paper proposes a Transformer-based PV capacity estimation and reactive power optimization method for ADN with limited information. The self-attention mechan...
Ran Gu, Ke-Man Lin, Yi-Bo Liu et al.· 2026 6th Power System and Gr...· 0 citations
Context. The growing integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) into power distribution networks demands fast and accurate power flow (PF) analysis for real-time monitoring, state estimation, and optimal dispatch. The Newton-Raphson (NR) method, while robust, becomes computationally expensive when invoked repea...
D. Voitekh, A. Tymoshenko· Radio Electronics, Computer...· 0 citations
Targeting voltage fluctuations in distribution networks with high distributed PV penetration and the high computational cost of centralized optimization, this paper proposes a decentralized reactive power and voltage optimization method using comprehensive index‐driven GNN partitioning and improved ADMM. First, based o...
Zhi-Chao Yang, Hong-Yang Jin, Jia-Qi Shi et al.· IEEJ TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRI...· 0 citations
An edge computing-enabled optimal control method is proposed for low-voltage distribution networks organized as distribution transformer clusters (DTCs) that reduces overvoltage occurrences in TQ1 by 81.0% and eliminates undervoltage occurrences under four PV scenarios with SOP-based balancing.