A Method for Propositionalizing Prenex Normal Form Sentences under Inclusive Semantics and Testing the Validity of Inferences Formed from Such Sentences
Sep 2026· Communications in Humanities Research· 0 citations
TL;DR
This method provides a new approach to propositionalizing some FOL sentences over infinite domains and testing the validity of inferences composed of them, and it may be applied to formal reasoning in mathematics and physics.
Abstract
Quantifier expansion requires enumerating the objects in the domain one by one. Therefore, it can only handle finite domains. This paper proposes a different perspective on propositionalization: rather than counting objects in the domain, it focuses on the finite regions determined by the sentence. Therefore, within its scope of application, even if the domain contains infinitely many objects, this method can still produce a finite propositionalization. This paper distinguishes two kinds of FOL based on different semantics: basic FOL, which allows the domain to be empty, and strengthened FOL, which requires a non-empty domain. This paper focuses on the basic FOL. At present, the basic FOL method only applies to prenex normal form sentences. To propositionalize such sentences, this paper introduces the Region Table and uses it to translate prenex-normal-form sentences into TFL sentences. On this basis, FOL inferences composed of such sentences can also be translated into TFL inferences, allowing their validity to be tested using TFL rules. This method provides a new approach to propositionalizing some FOL sentences over infinite domains and testing the validity of inferences composed of them, and it may be applied to formal reasoning in mathematics and physics.
It is proved that $\mathbf{B}_{ti}$ is the multiple-succedent sequent calculus read upside down, that $\mathbf{G}_{ti}$ admits the structural rules, and that $\mathbf{B}_{ti}$ is sound and complete for Kripke semantics, with the finite model property and a block-theoretic proof of the disjunction property.
New proofs of weak normalization for intuitionistic and classical propositional logics (with the full set of operators -- falsum, implication, conjunction and disjunction) are presented and a deterministic algorithm for weak normalization is presented.
The shallow embedding of higher-order modal logic in classical higher-order logic, used in Benzm\"uller and Scott's Notes on G\"odel's and Scott's variants of the ontological argument, reaches beyond the modal object language: its quantifiers range over domains containing the nominals and satisfaction operators of hybr...
This paper looks at the results of testing deontic axioms and systems with example problems using Kripke semantics and possible worlds over accessibility relations in the context of a large ontology, and considers the notion of a sanction in a Contrary To Duty scenario.
Christopher Feener, Adam Pease, Richard Thompson· 0 citations
A modular logical framework for both reasoning with and measuring inconsistency in propositional knowledge bases that captures several existing forms of inconsistency-tolerant reasoning, including entailment based on maximal satisfiable subsets and the minimally inconsistent Logic of Paradox.
Yakoub Salhi· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
NAFBench is introduced, a procedural generator of solver-certified instances spanning four semantic viewpoints: SLDNF, well-founded semantics (WFS), and credulous and skeptical reasoning under stable-model semantics, which studies which reading of negation large language models adopt by default and whether they can ove...
Qiming Bao, Agnieszka Mensfelt, Michael J. Witbrock et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.