Skip to content
Open access

SPEAR: Phase-Aware Multi-Noise Removal for Supervised Fault-Event Detection and Localization in Simulated Factory Scenes

2026 · IEEE Access · Vol 14, pp. 118114-118128 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The proposed framework, SPEAR (Spatial Phase-aware Event Acoustic Ranging), attains an operating-range event-detection area-under-curve (AUC) of 0.981 against 0.932 for an unsupervised Mahalanobis reference over the same range; the main advantage is at −5 dB, where the spatial front-end raises the AUC from 0.945 against 0.859 for the unsupervised reference.

Abstract

Acoustic condition monitoring of factory machinery must operate under heavy multi-source interference: many machines run simultaneously, environmental noise is broadband, and workers speak while moving through the plant. A target machine fault is treated as a sustained acoustic event embedded in this multi-noise field, and the problem is cast as combined multi-noise removal, continuous fault-event detection, and source localization on a synchronized distributed microphone array. Unlike first-shot unsupervised anomaly detection, representative fault-event clips are assumed available at training time, so the task is treated as supervised target fault-event detection and localization. All experiments use simulated scenes; no real factory recordings are used. Taking the phase-aware lightweight framework DUAL-RES as a reference, a modified complex-mask denoiser with an integrated classifier is designed for the factory target-event setting, a multichannel spatial front-end that exploits inter-channel phase differences is introduced to provide spatial cues that help distinguish a directional fault from directional and diffuse interference, and the fault is localized with an event-mask-weighted, partially-whitened steered-response estimator, in which the learned event mask emphasizes the fault’s active frequency bands and partial whitening avoids the noise amplification of full phase transform (PHAT) weighting. On synthetic factory scenes rendered with room acoustics, DCASE machine sounds, DEMAND environmental noise, and moving or stationary speech, and over an operating range of −5 to + 10 dB event signal-to-noise ratio (event-SNR), the proposed framework, SPEAR (Spatial Phase-aware Event Acoustic Ranging), attains an operating-range event-detection area-under-curve (AUC) of 0.981 against 0.932 for an unsupervised Mahalanobis reference over the same range; the main advantage is at −5 dB, where the spatial front-end raises the AUC from 0.860 for a supervised single-channel model to 0.938 (and from 0.784 for the unsupervised reference). Including the below-range −10 dB condition, the full-range AUC is 0.945 against 0.859 for the unsupervised reference. For localization, the same steered-response estimator is weighted by the SPEAR event mask; the mask’s benefit is concentrated at low SNR, cutting the median horizontal error at −5 dB from 6.57 m for the unweighted estimator to 1.93 m (a $3.4\times $ improvement) and roughly halving the operating-range 90th-percentile error (14.68 to 8.45 m). Over 0 to + 10 dB both the unweighted partially-whitened estimator and SPEAR remain median sub-meter, with partial whitening rather than the mask the dominant factor; there the mask is slightly detrimental in median and accuracy within one meter, and a clear gap to the oracle-separation reference remains, especially at 0 dB. Below the operating range (−10 dB) the fault is globally about 10 dB below the aggregate background and provides too few event-dominant frequency bands for reliable mixture-based localization, a practical limit that is analyzed and left as future work. A hard-negative analysis further shows that the detector ranks speech and impulsive-knock transients below true faults but does not distinguish normal machine foregrounds, confirming that the task is supervised target-event detection rather than general anomaly discrimination. All learned components remain compact, with at most 1.04 M parameters, making SPEAR a candidate for future on-device deployment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Conference Sep 2026

Few-Shot Adaptation for Anomalous Sound Detection at Low False-Positive Rate

Reliable fault detection is crucial for industrial machinery in large-scale facilities, where unexpected failures can cause costly downtime and production interruptions. Although acoustic monitoring provides a scalable solution for machine condition monitoring, its deployment is often constrained by high false-positive...

Simone Lugani, C. Pichler, H. Wegleiter et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Fusion-Inception-Aux: An Auxiliary-Supervised Multi-Scale Fusion Network for Distributed Acoustic Sensing Event Recognition

Results indicate that multi-scale Inception encoding and auxiliary supervision are the most important components, while the PatchX interaction module provides no consistent additional gain under the current setting.

Tian-Chang Xie, Hai-Ling Wang, Wei-Guang Wang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Automatic LOFAR Line-Spectrum Extraction with Hybrid Dataset Construction and a Continuity-Aware U-Net

Line-spectrum features in ship-radiated noise are essential for the analysis and recognition of passive sonar targets. Robust automatic extraction from low-frequency analysis and recording (LOFAR) spectrograms remains challenging in underwater acoustic environments owing to strong background fluctuations and interferen...

Zhong-Di Liu, Chenmu Li, Bin Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Noise-Aware Temporal Fusion Network for SCADA-Based Fault-State Recognition of Gas Pressure Regulators in Natural Gas Distribution Processes

Reliable operating-state recognition of gas pressure regulators is essential for pressure stability, operational safety, and supply continuity in urban natural gas distribution networks. However, SCADA pressure–flow signals from regulating stations are often affected by non-stationary noise, impulsive disturbances, lim...

Wentao Li, Tao Chen, Yilong Shang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Preprocessing and Capability–Risk Coupling in an Event-Synchronized Dual-Frontend Speech Sensor System

An intelligent speech sensor is often evaluated at recognition output, although acquisition and preprocessing also determine what reaches control. We examine this propagation in an event-synchronized dual-frontend system. A conditional cascade separates artifact availability, evidence formation, semantic conversion, an...

Han Chen, Zhan-Yu Zhu · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A novel multi-sensor fault diagnosis framework based on PPS feature selection and K-means initialized particle swarm classifier using MiniRocket feature extraction

Acoustic sensors and microphone array technologies are widely used in industrial condition monitoring and fault diagnosis, and their reliability directly affects monitoring stability and equipment safety. However, existing acoustic sensor fault diagnosis methods under complex operating conditions still face limitations...

Tian-Shuo Wu, Wei Shi, Ding-Yu Hu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.