Skip to content
Open access

A Digital Twin to Predict Patient Response to Valve Replacement Following Aortic Stenosis

Sep 2026 · Fluids · Vol 11, pp. 221 · 0 citations · 23 references

TL;DR

An image-based analysis protocol is developed, coupling 0D left heart and systemic circulation components with a 3D aortic valve model to measure and to predict the pressure gradient across the aortic valve at rest.

Abstract

Lack of available data, ease of clinical use and lack of evidence for prognostic benefit are arguably the key limitations to clinical uptake for any model. This paper reports the development of an image-based analysis protocol, coupling 0D left heart and systemic circulation components with a 3D aortic valve model to measure and to predict the pressure gradient across the aortic valve at rest. The model is personalized using routine clinical data available for aortic valve patients, augmented by additional image data (transesophageal echo and/or CT) to support valve characterization. Computed aortic pressure gradient both pre- and post-intervention was compared with clinical measurements based on Doppler ultrasound for a cohort of 21 patients with aortic valve disease. Correlation for the diseased state measures were adequate (R2= 0.81) for those cases for which associated image data was deemed to be of acceptable quality for segmentation to support a 3D computational fluid dynamics analysis but poor otherwise. Post treatment correlation was reasonable (R2= 0.47) for all cases. Importantly, the personalized model presented here describes the interaction between the patient’s cardiovascular system, including the heart and circulation, and the valve, rather than evaluating the valve in isolation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Updates on Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Aortic Stenosis.

Integration of echocardiography, computed tomography, CMR, and emerging positron emission tomography and artificial intelligence-based approaches can help address diagnostic uncertainty in aortic stenosis.

H. Itani, M. Moumneh, Ahmed A. Zayed et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

REsting FLOW rate to determine true Aortic valve Severity (REFLOW-AS).

In situations with discordant echo data, TFR supports the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis and negates the need for further diagnostic imaging.

H. Elzein, Alexandra Thompson, Tim Irvine et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Towards Modeling the Hemodynamic Impact of Mitral and Aortic Valve Repair in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Valve dysfunction is a major threat to long-term success in left ventricle assist device (LVAD) therapy, with direct implications for right heart performance. In this study, we apply a patient-specific, image-based computational modeling framework to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of simulated mitral and aortic valve...

Mia Bonini, Michael Ferguson, Marc Hirshvogel et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Impact, and Response to TAVR: Insights From Egnite Data.

Patients with concurrent MR and AS exhibit substantially higher mortality yet have high rates of undertreatment throughout the duration of follow-up, and TAVR alone significantly improves MR in most patients.

Benjamin E. Peterson, Philippe Généreaux, Pinak B. Shah et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Moderate aortic stenosis: diagnostic pitfalls and the role of multimodality imaging in risk stratification and clinical management

Moderate aortic stenosis (AS) has traditionally been considered a transitional and relatively benign stage of valvular disease. Yet, contemporary evidence shows that it is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality even before progression to severe AS. This paper synthesizes current evidence on the limitations...

G. Santangelo, A. Maloberti, C. Tognola et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Evaluating the hemodynamic impact of different aortic valve treatments via two-way FSI

Three-dimensional two-way fluid-structure interaction simulations are used to compare the differences in hemodynamics and valvular stress distribution between native aortic valves, Ozaki leaflets, Ross leaflets, and bioprosthetic heart valve.

Zhao-Miao Liu, Xin-Yi Zhou, Yi Shi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.