Skip to content
Open access

Sustainability evaluation of complex systems (Part 1): a new operational, strategic and communication tool

Dec 2026 · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators · 0 citations · 80 references

Abstract

Sustainability assessment has become central to production systems, but existing tools often provide fragmented, product-oriented, static, or poorly interpretable evaluations. Current assessment methods rarely integrate production functions with territorial characteristics, ecosystem services and dynamic data flows. Moreover, many tools depend on proprietary databases, specialised users and delayed outputs, limiting their practical usefulness for all potential users. This study proposes a new sustainability assessment framework designed to evaluate complex systems as agricultural and agro-livestock systems at farm level. The method aims to provide objective, transparent and decision-relevant information, while supporting policy guidance, farm management and communication along the supply chain. The method organises sustainability into three domains: environmental, territorial and social-economic. Relevant clusters are selected for each domain and assessed through farm-level indicators and territorial-context indicators. Drawing on risk assessment theory, each cluster is evaluated by combining the frequency of farm functions with the magnitude of their contextual effects. Indicators are normalised into a four-level matrix to obtain four grades for farm functions (lacking, rare, probable, highly probable), and environmental, territorial and social-economic vulnerability (light, medium, heavy, very heavy) of the farm settlement area. This evaluation results in sixteen values, which are then classified into four classes (negligible; medium; relevant; very relevant), aggregated into a sustainability composite index and, where appropriate, weighted according to policy priorities. The framework offers a dynamic, system-oriented and potentially semi-automated tool for routine on-farm assessments. It can support benchmarking, ex-ante evaluations, sustainable intensification, policy incentives, circularity strategies and consumer communication through a sustainability classification or label.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Sustainability Assessment in Warehouses and Intralogistics: A Systematic Literature Review of Environmental, Economic, Social, and Governance Dimensions, KPI Frameworks, and Digital Technologies

Background: Warehouse systems are critical nodes in global supply chains, yet the holistic assessment of their sustainability performance remains a significant research challenge. Existing studies tend to examine sustainability dimensions in isolation, predominantly focusing on energy consumption and cost optimization...

Dimitra Tzanetou, S. Ponis, G. Plakas et al. · 0 citations
Conference Sep 2026

Implementation of Simplified Sustainability Indicators in Construction SMEs: Evidence from Interventionist Research

This study aims to develop and apply a simplified set of sustainability indicators within a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) in the infrastructure construction sector, assessing their operational viability, implementation costs, and the potential for integrating these indicators into management processes and man...

Pierre da Silva Marinho, A. L. F. de S. Vasconcelos, Umbelina Cravo Teixeira Lagioia et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Assessing the sustainability performance of large food retail companies: a generic framework and pilot application to the environmental dimension in Germany

Food systems are central to Sustainable Development Goal 12, and large food retailers occupy a strategic position between producers and consumers. Comparative scientific assessments of retailer sustainability performance and retailer-specific conceptual frameworks remain limited. We developed a generic four-...

C. Schader, Olivia Keller, M. Teriete et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Operationalising ecosystem service co-production: A decision-oriented approach for integrated ecosystem assessments

Ecosystem Services (ES), or Nature’s Contributions to People (NCP), are increasingly understood as products of interactions between natural and anthropogenic inputs. However, co-production remains unevenly implemented in ecosystem assessments. Rather than seeking to measure or causally decompose co-production across al...

Christos Zoumides, Emily Bank, Salwa Aabid et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Evolution of Environmental Impact Assessment and its Contribution to Sustainability

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has emerged as a fundamental instrument in environmental planning and decision-making processes across the globe. It provides a structured and systematic approach for identifying, predicting, and evaluating the potential environmental, social, and economic impacts of proposed devel...

Sushmita Ghosh, Chayan Biswas · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Integrating Collaborative Governance and Environmental Performance Assessment for Nature-Based Solutions: The euPOLIS Experience in Palermo

Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) are increasingly recognized as strategic tools for climate adaptation and urban regeneration, yet their implementation requires balancing environmental performance, territorial identity, and governance feasibility. This article investigates the application of the euPOLIS H2020 methodology...

Ferdinando Trapani, Simona Colajanni, Luisa Lombardo · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.