2026· Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics· pp. 34702-34716· 0 citations· 21 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
The ATGL serves as a general optimization objective that can be readily applied to different DocRE models and outperforms other DocRE losses and achieves state-of-the-art results, while consistently improving the performance of existing DocRE models.
Abstract
Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to determine which relations hold between a given entity pair within a document. As a multi-label classification task, the most commonly adopted paradigm introduces a learnable threshold to distinguish positive and negative classes for an entity pair. Under this paradigm, existing losses decouple the optimization into independent positive and negative losses, which interact solely with a shared threshold. This leads to two inherent limitations: ( i ) threshold instability caused by conflicting gradient updates from the decoupled losses; and ( ii ) optimization bias exacerbated by the severe imbalance between limited positive samples and abundant negative samples inherent in DocRE, which makes the model more likely to predict that no relation exists. To address these issues, we propose the A daptive-T hreshold G lobal L oss (ATGL). Unlike prior work, ATGL integrates positive, negative, and threshold optimization into a unified logit space and explicitly enforces ranking constraints on their contributions to the objective. Furthermore, ATGL incorporates an imbalance-aware optimization mechanism, thereby effectively addressing the severe class imbalance in DocRE. Our ATGL serves as a general optimization objective that can be readily applied to different DocRE models. Experiments on four datasets show that ATGL outperforms other DocRE losses and achieves state-of-the-art results, while consistently improving the performance of existing DocRE models. Code is available at https: //github.com/xhm-code/ATGL .
Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to extract relations among multiple entities across extended contexts while maintaining consistency across predicted triples. Although large language models (LLMs) show remarkable reasoning capabilities in information extraction, their predictions are typically generated independently for each candidate triple and may violate fundamental relational constraints such as transitivity, symmetry, and functional uniqueness, leading to contradictory and unreliable outputs. We propose CONSISTRE, a unified consistency-aware framework for DocRE that addresses this limitation through two complementary tracks. The first operates at inference time for black-box LLMs, combining constraint-aware prompting, constraint-based verification, and iterative self-reflection to refine predictions without task-specific fine-tuning. The second injects consistency knowledge into smaller open-source models via a knowledge distillation and reinforcement learning pipeline: reasoning traces from a powerful teacher are distilled into a student via supervised fine-tuning, followed by GRPO alignment using a composite reward that jointly optimizes extraction performance and relational consistency. Together, the two tracks cover both API-accessible and locally deployable scenarios under a unified consistency formulation. Experiments on DocRED show that both tracks outperform their baselines, with the inference-time track achieving competitive F1 using off-the-shelf black-box LLMs and the training-time track substantially narrowing the gap between 7--8B open-source models and state-of-the-art proprietary LLMs at a fraction of their inference cost. Ablation studies confirm that explicit consistency modeling mitigates relational contradictions and enhances the reliability of LLM-based DocRE across both deployment paradigms.
AssistEM, a framework for efficient LLM adaptation to EM via principled data selection, demonstrates that selective fine-tuning not only accelerates adaptation but also improves training efficiency (requiring fewer GPU hours), enabling open-source LLMs to rival–and in some cases outperform–closed-source models.
John Bosco Mugeni, S. Lynden, Toshiyuki Amagasa et al.· International Journal of Dat...· 0 citations
Generative Retrieval (GR) formulates retrieval as a sequence-to-sequence generation task, assigning each document a document identifier (DocID) and retrieving it through autoregressive decoding, making DocID design a critical factor in retrieval quality. However, existing schemes based on discrete representation learning suffer from inherent collision issues and create a mismatch between the DocID's encoding objective and the system's business optimization target. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{Cluster-Ranked Identifier (CRID)}, which decouples DocID into \textit{semantic clustering} and \textit{business-value ranking}, yielding collision-free identifiers that support incremental updates via intra-cluster reranking. We further introduce an analytical framework that decomposes retrieval gains into \textit{personalized preference} and \textit{statistical prior} generalization, revealing how semantic cluster size governs the balance between the two components. Experiments on a Taobao e-commerce corpus of over 300M items show that CRID surpasses the strongest embedding-based retrieval baseline on top-K Hitrate, and delivers +1.06\% GMV in full-traffic deployment.
The results indicate that the proposed framework effectively enhances the quality and structural consistency of generated hyper-relational data while mitigating the effects of long-tail distributions and pseudo-negative samples without requiring additional manual annotations.
Xinzhi Du, Yan Chen, Siqi Xu et al.· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) struggle to classify text into taxonomies with many semantically similar labels, as the distinctions are domain-specific and not captured by pre-training. To handle large label spaces, a common approach retrieves top-$K$ candidate labels by embedding similarity and prompt the LLM to choose among them. However, top-$K$ retrieval reduces the number of candidates but does not help the model tell similar ones apart. When two similar labels both appear as candidates, the model lacks the signal to choose correctly between them. We propose a framework that (1) identifies which label pairs the model struggles to distinguish, (2) expands the candidate set to include confusable labels, and (3) generates targeted rules to differentiate between similar candidates. The framework requires no fine-tuning, and the generated rules transfer to smaller, cheaper models. On three benchmarks (WOS, Flipkart, LEDGAR), our approach improves Macro F1 by up to 10.0pp over retrieval baselines, with smaller models (2B--20B) gaining up to 11.5pp via cross-model transfer.