Sep 2026· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence· pp. 3402-3409· 0 citations· 21 references
TL;DR
It is shown that standard approaches based on unilateral improvement moves can fail to provide any finite approximation guarantee even for simple extensions of Pd--Flip games, so an algorithmic framework based on coordinated moves by small groups of players is proposed, whose approximation guarantee and number of moves are controlled by two natural game parameters, the stretch and the spread.
Abstract
Potential games are a fundamental class of games in which pure Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist, yet computing such equilibria is computationally intractable for several subclasses. This has led to extensive research on computing approximate pure Nash equilibria. In this paper, we study payoff-maximization potential games.
For these games, strong approximation guarantees are known only for restricted subclasses, most notably Pd--Flip games. We show that standard approaches based on unilateral improvement moves can fail to provide any finite approximation guarantee even for simple extensions of Pd--Flip games. To overcome this limitation, we propose an algorithmic framework based on coordinated moves by small groups of players, whose approximation guarantee and number of moves are controlled by two natural game parameters, the stretch and the spread, which are bounded for broad classes of games of interest. In the special case of Pd--Flip games, our framework can be configured to recover the existing algorithm, matching its approximation guarantee and the number of moves performed.
We develop a cutting-plane algorithm for computing pure Nash equilibria in finite integer games with shared constraints, where a deviation may be feasible against one opponent profile and infeasible against another. Conditional equilibrium inequalities capture this dependence through an explicit activation term. We giv...
Bai-Nian Hao, Hyunwoo Lee, Robert Hildebrand et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces an independently randomized formulation in which each stopping rule is represented by an adapted, nondecreasing cumulative stopping process, and identifies an exact-potential subclass with a closed-form threshold equilibrium.
We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To...
Turn-based deterministic games on graphs are two-player zero-sum games played on finite directed graphs, where the vertex set is partitioned between the Max and the adversarial Min Player. The respective player chooses outgoing edges from their vertices. We consider these games with the classical discounted-sum and mea...
Ali Asadi, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Rui-Chen Luo· 0 citations
We show that distinct pure-strategy Nash equilibria typically have different utilitarian welfare values in sufficiently rich classes of $C^2$ games with open strategy sets. Here, typical means both generic and finitely prevalent, while rich means that the class admits a finite-dimensional family of perturbations that c...
Moeen Nehzati· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.