Skip to content
Book Open access

Worldly Indeterminacy

Sep 2026 · 0 citations

Abstract

This monograph provides a framework to support and reinforce the recent shift in analytic philosophy toward recognizing indeterminacy—or more narrowly, vagueness—as a feature of the world itself. Having defended worldly or metaphysical indeterminacy against influential challenges and examined traditional and contemporary resources, the work develops a systematic theory, termed “ontic indeterminacy,” that analyzes the fundamental characteristics of this phenomenon through the complementary ideas of conclusive indeterminability and provisional determinability. This theory also addresses related semantic, logical, and applicational issues while demonstrating the potential for indeterminacy to permeate all aspects of reality. Analytic philosophers acknowledging worldly indeterminacy occasionally treat it as a defect of the world and often model it in terms of determinacies and precisifications. In contrast, the theory views the indeterminacy as an expression of the world’s constitutional plenitude and models it at the object level in a way consonant with its deep-rooted and intricate character. While set within the context of the analytic tradition, this work adopts a “fusion philosophy” approach by synthesizing Chinese Madhyamaka Buddhist thought with analytic metaphysics, positioning itself as both a cross-cultural philosophical exploration and a contribution to contemporary debates. By incorporating Buddhist perspectives, the work expands conceptual horizons for analytic philosophers, transcending certain presumptions and limitations of mainstream Western philosophy. It also reveals the contemporary implications of Madhyamaka thought and exemplifies the significance of cross-cultural philosophical engagement.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

J. N. Findlay’s Rational Mysticism

The philosopher John Niemeyer Findlay (1903–1987) held that the insights of mystical experience can be philosophically analyzed and articulated in rational form. Findlay provided two routes to the “mystical pole of the cosmos.” In the first, he appealed to the related notions of impersonality and impartiality to transc...

S. Drob · 0 citations
Book 2026

Logic and the Unknowability of God

A rigorous analysis of the paradoxes of apophatic theology, revealing its deep logical structure and challenging inconsistencies. In this book, Piotr Urbanczyk delves into the theory known as negative, or apophatic, theology where God is completely ineffable and unknowable. This doctrine, however, presents a paradox:...

P. Urbańczyk · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The Future as a Philosophical Problem

The article examines the future as a distinct philosophical problem inseparable from the broader issue of temporality. It demonstrates that the Enlightenment belief in linear progress was an uncritically accepted metaphysical premise rooted in the externalist ontology of modernity. Drawing on the philosophy of Plato, A...

Dugin Alexander G. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A genealogy of the world in Kant and Wittgenstein

I connect the evolution of the world in the transition from the early to the late Wittgenstein to the controversies of the world Kant had with his contemporaries. I show how the metaphysics of the world sustains meaning. Early in his career Kant defines the world as a complete totality consisting in substances with a m...

Daniel Dal Monte · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Bertrand Russell’s Logicism versus Immanuel Kant’s Antinomies of Reason

The article argues that the logicism through which Russell approached Kant’s antinomies possessed a distinct character, determined by: a) discovery of paradoxes, and b) theory of types as finding ways to solve them. The paper demonstrates both the strengths and weaknesses of Russell’s logicism regarding his approach to...

Viktor Kozlovskyi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.