Skip to content
Open access

Responsible integration of artificial intelligence in clinical care: An American Association of Orthodontists position paper.

Sep 2026 · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Vol 170 3, pp. 299-321.e4 · 1 citation · 66 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The seamless integration of AI into orthodontic and dental care positions the orthodontist not only as the final decision-maker in the use of AI for patient care but also as the responsible party.

Abstract

This paper, which is adapted for publication and differs slightly from the original version distributed to American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) members in January 2026, is authored by the AAO Task Force on Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics, and provides professional guidance for the responsible development, implementation, and oversight of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in orthodontic clinical care. Although not regulatory, it establishes a framework to support ethical adoption, patient safety, and professional accountability in the integration of AI systems. The objectives of this paper are to preserve professional authority, promote transparency in AI development, protect patient safety, and establish a principles-based framework. These objectives will be guided through the following 6 core principles: (1) AI governance and the human-in-command, (2) regulatory alignment and risk-based oversight, (3) trustworthiness and transparency across the lifecycle, (4) patient autonomy, (5) education and clinical AI competency, and (6) operational integration and data privacy. The seamless integration of AI into orthodontic and dental care positions the orthodontist not only as the final decision-maker in the use of AI for patient care but also as the responsible party. Through transparency and a clear understanding of the underlying algorithms and learning models, orthodontists can deliver enhanced care that thoughtfully integrates technological innovation with traditional biomechanical principles without compromising patient safety, quality of care, or autonomy.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Using artificial intelligence in clinical practice: Royal Australasian College of Physicians position statement.

The RACP advocates for physicians to engage in AI development and implementation using an agile human-in-the-loop approach that prioritises patient safety, clinical governance, professional training and collaboration with stakeholders.

Ian A. Scott, Christian White, Tim Shaw et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Ethics and Professionalism in Artificial Intelligence and Medical Practice: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in health care is being rapidly adopted in perhaps one of the most rapid implementations of technology in medicine to date. Better thought of as augmented intelligence, as a tool that provides assistance to physicians and patients, many guidelines for its use have been issued, but consensus...

Matthew DeCamp, Lois Snyder Sulmasy, Kyle E. Karches · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

From Adoption to Account Ability: Governing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Subsets in Medical and Dental Education

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical and dental education marks a transformative shift in how knowledge is produced, delivered, and assessed. From adaptive learning systems to generative tools, AI is reshaping medical and dental learning environments globally. This adoption is accelerating...

S. Khan · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Ethical perspectives on artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a critical review

It is concluded that, despite the great potential of artificial intelligence to improve ophthalmic care, final responsibility for diagnosis and patient management remains exclusively with the physician.

Gabrielle Araújo de Melo, Fernando Luiz Westphal, Thiago Russo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A Review of the TITAN Guideline: Advancing Transparency and Responsible Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical Research and Scholarly Publishing

The TITAN guidelines are reviewed as a practical framework for improving transparency and responsible reporting of AI use in medical research and scholarly publishing and can accommodate emerging AI technologies, including multimodal and agentic systems.

Arzoo Nazir, Shah Zeb · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.