Skip to content
Preprint

Grounding and Explaining Visual Evidence for AI-Generated Image Detection in Human-Centric Scenes

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 38 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work presents HAVE (Human-centric AI-generated Visual Evidence), a diverse human-centric dataset, and proposes PAVE, a Perception-Aware Visual Evidence framework that jointly performs authenticity prediction, visual evidence grounding, and region-aligned explanation generation.

Abstract

Rapid advances in image generation models call for interpretable AI-generated image detection methods that not only determine authenticity but also provide supporting visual evidence. Existing approaches may produce inconsistencies between generated explanations and localized evidence regions, undermining the reliability of explanations for authenticity decisions. Meanwhile, existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of the diverse human-centric scenes prevalent in generated imagery. To address these limitations, we investigate authenticity detection with grounded and explainable visual evidence in human-centric scenes. We present HAVE (Human-centric AI-generated Visual Evidence), a diverse human-centric dataset comprising 40K real and 39K AI-generated images from 10 recent generators, with 106K localized evidence instances across 8 evidence categories, each annotated with a bounding box and a region-aligned explanation. We further propose PAVE, a Perception-Aware Visual Evidence framework that jointly performs authenticity prediction, visual evidence grounding, and region-aligned explanation generation. PAVE employs a judge-guided alignment reward to assess region--explanation consistency and evidence validity, together with perception-aware regularization that contrasts token-level predictions between original and randomly masked images to promote reliance on visual input. Experiments on HAVE and external datasets demonstrate strong performance in authenticity detection, visual evidence grounding, and explanation quality. Code and data will be released upon publication.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Defake-o3: From Speculative Rationales to Verifiable Evidence for Explainable AIGI Detection

Defake-o3 is presented, an explainable AIGI detector that moves from speculative rationales to verifiable evidence, and Experiments show that Defake-o3 improves both detection accuracy and explanation quality, producing more localized, verifiable, and persuasive evidence.

Bowen Deng, Jiahui Zhan, Yikun Ji et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Look Before You Judge: Training-Free Region Mining for Grounded and Explainable Deepfake Detection

Look Before You Judge, a training-free framework that formulates explainable deepfake detection as a sequential evidence acquisition process, and improves detection accuracy by up to 12.8%, reduces CHAIR by up to 33.4% and hallucination rate by up to 21.3%, and outperforms representative training-free decoding and atte...

Chia-Ling Chen, Yu-Ting Ta, Jian-Yu Jiang-Lin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Evidence-RL: Towards Evidence-intensive Visual Reasoning

This work proposes Counterfactual Evidence Disentanglement (CED), a training-time evidence audit for VLM grounding, which outperforms prior RL-based post-training methods, with targeted analyses verifying its object-centric signal.

Haojie Huang, Xin-Lei Yu, Cheng-Ming Xu et al. · 3 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Thinking in Pictures: A Systematic Benchmark for Reasoning-driven Image Generation

This work introduces RIG-BENCH, a novel comprehensive benchmark that systematically evaluates Reasoning-driven Image Generation (RIG) across four cognitively demanding domains: Concept-based, Transformation-based, Pattern&Structure, and Scenario-based.

Yu-Tong Liu, Nan Huang, Xu Cao et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

GenPuzzle: Benchmarking Visual Reasoning in Image Generation Models

GenPuzzle provides a testbed for measuring progress from image rendering toward visual problem solving, and uses task-specific evaluation protocols that select the automatic judge by measuring agreement with human reference scores.

Chang-Peng Zhao, Yi-Ren Song, Jin-Peng Wang · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Tracing the Evidence: Faithful Token Attribution Through Vision-Language Reasoning

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet the visual and textual evidence supporting the generated responses remains difficult to identify. Faithful token attribution explains an LVLM's response by assigning scores that rank image and prompt tokens by how much the model relies on t...

Bo-Wen Yuan, Danny Wang, Rui-Hong Qiu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.