Skip to content

Can a Cacheable Decision Model Follow Rules?

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 15 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Certo is a small non-generative decision model (Qwen3-4B): it scores candidate actions from their text and returns a probability, instead of generating an answer, and how much rule-sensitivity survives that move, and whether it can be trained back.

Abstract

Certo is a small non-generative decision model (Qwen3-4B): it scores candidate actions from their text and returns a probability, instead of generating an answer. The accurate design reads the state, the rules, and each candidate together (a joint scorer), so cost grows with the menu. Independent encoding lets each candidate be encoded once and reused across states (about 5x cheaper at 77 candidates), but separates state from candidate. We ask how much rule-sensitivity survives that move, and whether it can be trained back. Four experiments on Certo: (1) the tested conversion to cacheable scoring loses rule-sensitivity (recall@1 1.00 ->0.24) while the joint scorer holds 1.00, and a shortlist+rerank rescue fails; (2) targeted counterfactual supervision restores strong performance on held-out synthetic rule tasks (paraphrase, counterfactual, composition; reproducible across seeds), though we do not isolate whether predictions depend on the supplied rule; (3) on real rules the added benefit is not established -- after fixing a truncation confound, the joint scorer wins significantly on the short tier (0.861 vs 0.500) and directionally on the hard tier (0.655 vs 0.483, n=29); (4) a matched cross-domain real-prose mixture did not help and reduced contract accuracy (-9.3, -16.2 points). A cacheable encoder can be made rule-sensitive on its training distribution, but transfer to unseen-source real rules is not established; the joint scorer keeps an edge at the cost of caching.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

From Probabilities to Decisions: Search and Multi-Teacher Distillation with Jev

Probability-only models, which TypeSafe calls System One models, return calibrated probabilities for fixed choices in milliseconds and generate no text. We study one such model, Jev, through two tasks that require decisions under tight constraints. In bullet chess, a bot that places Jev's judgment inside Stockfish sear...

Mohamad Yazan Sadoun, S. Sharif, Y. Banad · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Evaluating and Benchmarking the System One Model Jev

Jev answers MMLU's calculation-heavy questions more accurately than other MMLU questions (94% vs. 91%), whereas both open models, and all three on C-Eval, find them harder.

Tobias Deußer, L. Sparrenberg, R. Sifa · 9 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Fast Models, Slow Evidence: A Paired and Self-Audited Evaluation of System-1 Decision Models for LLM Agent Harnesses

Agent harnesses make many small, typed decisions per task: which model to call, which tool to use, whether retrieved text is relevant, whether an input carries an injection. System-1 decision models answer such questions in a single forward pass with class probabilities, promising large cost and latency savings over LL...

Jia-Wei Li · 4 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Binarization Flattens the Score Space

Large language model (LLM) judges are often used as rewards to train policies on objectives that deterministic verifiers cannot capture. However, these rewards are often collapsed to pass/fail ({0, 1}), which reports the verdict but not how well a response met each criterion. We model each pass/fail verdict as a score...

Jacob Cole · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Risk-Controlled Selective LLM Answering by Pricing Label-Free Checks

PriceCheck is introduced, which builds a compact family of decision rules from label-free checks such as re-solving a problem, and shows that choosing how checks are combined and stopped matters alongside how well a verifier ranks answers.

D. Lee, Jungseob Lee, Chanjun Park et al. · 2 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.