An agentic AI (AAI) pipeline that autonomously recovers cross-market structure from contract text before prices enter the analysis is presented, demonstrating the potential for agentic AI as a structural discovery layer for prediction markets.
Abstract
Prediction markets allow users to trade on outcomes of real-world events, but are prone to fragmentation with overlapping questions, implicit equivalences, and hidden contradictions across markets. We present an agentic AI (AAI) pipeline that autonomously recovers cross-market structure from contract text before prices enter the analysis. The workflow first clusters markets into coherent topical groups using natural-language understanding over contract text and metadata, and then identifies contracts within each cluster, but from different event markets, that exhibit strong dependence or leader--follower relationships. We evaluate this system, along with a natural language inference (NLI) benchmark, on a large prediction market dataset from early 2026. Using resolved outcomes to evaluate identified relations, we find that AAI-identified relations are 62.8\% consistent with exchange-recorded settlements, whereas the NLI benchmark only achieves 40.6\% accuracy. Within clusters, the AAI output is sparse and also remarkably compatible as a signed graph with a frustration rate of 0.324\%. As an application, we show how discovered relations inform semantics-based trading strategies on prediction markets. One such strategy yields 14.12\% net ROI after fees in a two-month period in 2026. Overall, we demonstrate the potential for agentic AI as a structural discovery layer for prediction markets.
Artificial intelligence can improve financial information processing while also synchronizing decisions, concentrating operational dependence, and accelerating market feedback. Yet evidence on these effects is divided among market microstructure, machine‐learning risk analytics, algorithmic intermediation, and genera...
The results indicate that consistent relational patterns are present, although their strength varies across horizons and informational density, and suggests that sentiment analysis may be more appropriately understood as a mechanism for tracing knowledge flows within financial ecosystems rather than as a deterministic...
Péter Németh, Mária Bohdalová· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
This survey reviews agentic quantitative trading across five stages: factor mining, signal discovery, portfolio construction, order execution, and risk management, and finds that current systems remain concentrated on signal discovery, while complete integration with portfolio construction, execution, and risk control...
Feng-Rui Hua, Heng-Yi Yang, Xinqing Hao et al.· 1 citation
It is found that markets populated by LLM agents exhibit slower or no convergence towards market equilibrium, thus providing less efficient allocations than markets populated by humans, thus providing less efficient allocations than markets populated by humans.
P. Struski, Jakub 'Swistak, Inez Okulska et al.· 1 citation
This work proposes LEAP (Likelihood Elicitation and Aggregation for Probabilistic forecasting), which reorganizes how collected evidence is used in the prediction stage and improves most prediction and calibration metrics across models and remains stronger under controlled comparisons of prior access, inference budget,...
Yu-Fei Chen, Yi-Ran Zhao, Xiao-Gang Xu et al.· 2 citations