Skip to content
Open access

A practical decision-making approach for tiered in silico chemical hazard assessment based on the safe and sustainable by design framework.

Sep 2026 · Environment International · Vol 216, pp. 110527 · 0 citations · 43 references
Medicine

TL;DR

An intuitive and harmonised workflow on how the use of quantitative structure-activity relationship -based in silico tools for preliminary hazard assessment and data gap filling, in accordance with the SSbD multi-tiered approach is presented.

Abstract

The "Safe and Sustainable by Design" (SSbD) approach promotes the development of chemicals that are inherently safer and more sustainable, including viable alternatives to hazardous substances. It involves assessing the toxicity, environmental impact and functionality of potential substitutes to ensure that they meet performance requirements without compromising safety. In silico methods using computational tools and simulations support the SSbD approach by predicting the toxicity, environmental persistence and performance of potential substitutes prior to upscaling in physical testing. This approach intends to accelerate the design process, reduce costs on the long run and improve safety and sustainability through the early identification of and optimisation towards safer and more sustainable chemicals and materials. Surfactants (SFs) and flame retardants (FRs) are among the many areas of interest to regulators and scientists across various industries. Due to the massive growth of global markets resulting from a wide range of their applications, and evidence of the adverse impact on the environment and human health, there is a pressing need to accelerate the design and implementation of safer alternatives for those chemicals. In this paper, we present an intuitive and harmonised workflow on how the use of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) -based in silico tools for preliminary hazard assessment and data gap filling, in accordance with the SSbD multi-tiered approach. We illustrate the practical application of these guidelines through three case studies that reflect realistic scenarios encountered by SSbD practitioners during chemical safety assessment. A harmonised, step-by-step decision-making process, supported by flowcharts included in our decision-making framework for Tier 0 and 1 Hazard Identification in regard of the Joint Research Centre (JRC)'s updated SSbD framework, enables users to assess the hazards associated with a given chemical substance in accordance with the most important and up-to-date regulations in force within the European Union (EU).

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Toxicity Aspects in Safe and Sustainable by Design Framework: An Assessment of Tools

The assessment of toxicity-related aspects in the Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) framework relies on several tools and methods. Each tool and method has specific goals and scopes, requiring knowledge of the underpinning characteristics for sound application and results interpretation. This study evaluates some...

Grazia Maria Cappucci, Elisabetta Abbate, Carla Caldeira et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Screening Chemical Alternatives with Limited Ecotoxicity Data To Support Safe and Sustainable by Design Innovation

Enabling effective early-stage screening of chemicals is essential for advancing safety and sustainability, as highlighted by the European Commission’s Safe and Sustainable by Design framework. However, such screening is often constrained by the limitedavailability of ecotoxicity data. Here, we investigate how chemical...

Elisabetta Abbate, S. Hoeks, Leo Posthuma et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Systematic review of current approaches to prioritise chemical contaminants of emerging concern for research and management in the water industry

Graphical abstract outlines the aims of the study, the approach, findings and opportunities. Contaminants of emerging concern (CEC), such as pharmaceuticals, hormones and industrial chemicals, pose a significant challenge for the water industry due to their presence in matrices including wastewater and drinking wate...

P. Neale, M. Dingemans, Marty Hancock et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Advancing Safety and Sustainability in Nanomaterials Industry: Methodological, Business, and Regulatory Implications

The rapid proliferation of chemicals and nanomaterials (CNMs) has resulted in significant cross‐sector innovation, delivering product enhancements such as improved UV protection and waterproof textiles. However, these advances present urgent challenges regarding human safety, environmental hazards, and regulatory com...

A. Fiorucci, Mario Miozza, G. Alimehmeti et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Reduction to Replacement: Challenges and Proposed Solutions for Animal-Free Safety Assessment of Hydrocarbon UVCB Substances

Highlights • UVCB substances derived from petroleum and renewable feedstocks are a category of complex substances spanning a continuum of hydrocarbon distributions, with well-established hazard profiles.• Read-across and predictive models developed based on historical datasets have been extensively used to reduce anima...

D. Holland, Louise Camenzuli, L. Kamelia et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Safe and Sustainable by Design Assessment of Flame Retardant Alternatives in Household Electronic Devices: A Comparison of Phosphinate-Based and Brominated Systems.

The European Commission (EC) introduced the Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) framework to support the transition toward a toxic-free environment and to foster chemical innovation through the (re)design of safer and more sustainable chemicals and materials. The present study applies the EC SSbD framework to assess...

F. Nikiforou, A. Beard, Qiang Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.