Oct 2026· Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction· 0 citations· 16 references
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in daily life, offering convenient support in many tasks like inspiration for text production or answering everyday questions. However, its risks often remain less visible, ranging from data security concerns to more subtle effects like growing dependence, negative impacts on creativity and reduced critical thinking. While responsible AI use is widely advocated, we argue that this responsibility cannot be achieved through education alone but must be supported through AI design. Specifically, AI systems should foster appropriate mental models in users. This workshop explores how design choices, such as reducing human-like AI design or communicating (un)certainty of responses, can support more informed and balanced use. Inviting perspectives from disciplines including computer science, psychology, design, and ethics, the workshop aims to (1) deepen understanding of failures caused by misleading mental models, (2) generate initial design strategies to address them, and (3) build a research community for future collaboration in studies, funding, initiatives, and publications.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.