Skip to content
Book Open access

CrossServe: Cross-Layer Scheduling for SLO Optimization in Multi-Tenant LLM Serving

Sep 2026 · Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing · 0 citations · 32 references

Abstract

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) as multi-tenant cloud services is now widespread, but maintaining high Service Level Objective (SLO) attainment across diverse tenants remains challenging. Current serving systems focus on a single layer of the stack, either using iteration-level batching or coarse-grained instance-level routing. This approach causes significant SLO violations during bursty workloads and struggles to balance throughput with differentiated tenant priorities. The core issue lies in intra-instance schedulers lacking awareness of the global cluster state, while cluster-level routers do not account for fine-grained, per-iteration execution behavior within each GPU. We introduce CrossServe, a cross-layer scheduling framework that jointly optimizes request routing, adaptive micro-batching, and tenant-weighted preemption to maximize SLO attainment in multi-tenant LLM serving. CrossServe integrates three complementary layers: (1) an online, lightweight length classifier that separates requests to reduce Head-of-Line (HoL) blocking; (2) an SLO-aware adaptive micro-batching system that dynamically tunes prefill chunk sizes based on the real-time Time-Per-Output-Token (TPOT) slack of decoding requests; and (3) a global routing and preemption layer that distributes load across GPU instances while using tenant weights when reclaiming resources under overload. We evaluate CrossServe with BurstGPT-derived trace replay on a 32-GPU cluster. Compared with vLLM, Sarathi-Serve, and SOLA, CrossServe increases overall SLO attainment by 53, 29, and 14 percentage points respectively (from 42% to 95%, from 66% to 95%, and from 81% to 95%) while sustaining high throughput. In the ablation workload, removing global routing raises P99 TTFT from 185 ms to 410 ms; the full system therefore reduces this tail latency by 54.9% relative to that ablation and improves the observed throughput–SLO tradeoff.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.