Protecting Patient Information in Healthcare.
TL;DR
It is suggested that the greatest threat to fairness and transparency when it comes to AI may not be people deliberately trying to cause harm, but rather a widespread culture of apathy and complacency that prevents people from taking action.
Abstract
This paper considers the connection between fairness and unfairness from a theoretical standpoint, highlighting the importance of critically evaluating the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on patients' perception of healthcare justice. The arguments and analysis are framed within the context of Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil' and Miranda Fricker's concept of 'epistemic injustice'. The article suggests that the greatest threat to fairness and transparency when it comes to AI may not be people deliberately trying to cause harm, but rather a widespread culture of apathy and complacency that prevents people from taking action. The paper concludes that renewing patients' commitment to critical thinking and encouraging them to take greater personal responsibility are key. More active and engaged citizenship is also required. By cultivating critical reflection, prioritising data privacy, promoting collective support, building emotional resilience, and advocating for ethical AI, individuals can transform their healthcare into a formidable bulwark against those who seek to curtail their autonomy and stifle their voices. This comprehensive healthcare strategy is about more than just the individual's welfare. It is also about creating a fair, self-governing society in which the potential of each person as a smart, active participant is recognised and protected.