Skip to content

Hybrid Ensemble Learning for EEG-Based Epileptic Seizure Forecasting

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 30 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A calibrated hybrid ensemble for EEG-based seizure forecasting that combines five deep learning models and three classical machine learning models through a logistic regression stacking meta-learner is proposed, evaluating the framework on CHB-MIT using strict Leave-One-Patient-Out (LOPO) cross-validation.

Abstract

Epileptic seizure forecasting aims to provide actionable warnings before seizure onset, yet patient-independent generalization and false-alarm control remain major challenges. We propose a calibrated hybrid ensemble for EEG-based seizure forecasting that combines five deep learning models and three classical machine learning models through a logistic regression stacking meta-learner. The proposed pipeline integrates signal preprocessing, handcrafted feature extraction, class-imbalance handling, probability calibration, and clinically motivated post-processing. We evaluate the framework on CHB-MIT using strict Leave-One-Patient-Out (LOPO) cross-validation, with threshold and post-processing parameters selected only on held-out meta data. On the filtered cohort, excluding patients with anomalous preictal rates below 1\% or above 15\%, the model achieves 74.2\% seizure-level sensitivity at 1.24 false alarms per hour, with an average warning time of 16.9 minutes. A test-tuned oracle constrained to the target false-alarm budget achieves 60.9\% sensitivity at 0.951 false alarms per hour, highlighting the importance of reporting sensitivity together with realized false-alarm rates. Our code is available at: https://github.com/DanaMason/IEEE-CARS-Hybrid-Ensemble-Learning-for-EEG-Based-Epileptic-Seizure-Forecasting

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.