MAPLE-RF: Efficient Probabilistic RF Source Localization in Partially Explored Environments
TL;DR
This work studies single-snapshot transmitter localization on partially explored maps and compares two approaches that output a posterior over transmitter locations, and concludes that digital-twin approach is more accurate on most single-snapshot metrics than MAPLE-RF.
Abstract
Localizing a radio-frequency (RF) transmitter from received signals often requires a model of the environment to predict how obstacles block and reflect the signal. In many robotic applications, however, only a partial map is available, particularly when a robot localizes the source while exploring with simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM). We study single-snapshot transmitter localization on such partially explored maps and compare two approaches that output a posterior over transmitter locations. The first extends a digital-twin method, which ray-traces every candidate location, to partial maps by treating unexplored space as free and training on mixed map coverage. The second, MAPLE-RF, encodes estimated path angles of arrival and signal-to-noise ratios as grid channels aligned with map knownness, occupancy, and line-of-sight visibility, and a U-Net scores all candidate positions in one pass without simulating propagation at inference. Ray-tracing simulations of indoor environments indicate that training on mixed map coverage is essential for both approaches. The digital-twin approach is more accurate on most single-snapshot metrics, while MAPLE-RF comes close at a query cost that does not depend on the propagation model and is more than two orders of magnitude below a fresh full-grid query with general-purpose ray tracing. Both outperform Gaussian and Gaussian-mixture baselines, and on exploration routes guided by its own estimates, fused MAPLE-RF posteriors place more probability near the source than the compared methods. Code and data will be released.