Skip to content
Open access

Climate-stratified assessment of PM2.5 using machine learning: Geographic controls dominate meteorological factors

Sep 2026 · PLoS ONE · Vol 21 · 0 citations · 49 references
Medicine

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a major environmental concern, yet pollution assessment models are rarely tested across fundamentally different climate regimes. We develop a climate-stratified machine-learning framework using 49,997 monthly MERRA-2 satellite-assimilated samples (2019–2023) across five latitude-band climate zones, evaluated through Leave-One-Climate-Out (LOCO) cross-validation with nested hyperparameter tuning to prevent data leakage. Tuned LightGBM achieves a global LOCO R2 = 0.367 (MAE =6.43 μg m-3), but predictability varies substantially by zone: subtropical regions reach R2 = 0.604, while tropical regions achieve only R2 = 0.142, reflecting fundamental climate-dependent limits on meteorology-only models. SHAP analysis shows geographic coordinates—acting as proxies for emission patterns and climatological transport pathways—account for 64% of predictive importance on average across zones, compared to 23% for meteorological variables, indicating that PM2.5 spatial structure is driven more by where emissions occur than by month-to-month weather variability. To verify that coordinates add genuine predictive value beyond spatial autocorrelation, a retrain ablation confirms that removing latitude and longitude collapses model performance across all zones (mean R2 drops from 0.367 to −0.099), while an IDW spatial baseline confirms that the ML model captures meteorological signal beyond simple proximity interpolation (+98% R2 improvement over IDW). Temporal validation (2019–2021 training, 2022–2023 testing) yields R2 = 0.544, confirming LOCO is the more demanding test. Ensemble stacking degrades performance relative to the zone-tuned model, providing evidence of feature-set saturation rather than model weakness. This reproducible, open-source framework offers a useful benchmark for reanalysis-based PM2.5 assessment, particularly in data-sparse regions where ground monitoring is limited.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.