Sep 2026· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence· 3 citations· 47 references
TL;DR
Graph Counterfactual Fairness (GCFair), a novel framework that achieves counterfactual fairness by explicitly identifying and disentangling the subsets of node features and graph structures genuinely affected by sensitive attributes, is proposed.
Abstract
Fairness-aware graph learning has become increasingly important amid growing concerns about algorithmic bias in networked data. Among existing approaches, counterfactual fairness is particularly appealing as it seeks to eliminate unfairness at its causal origin by ensuring that predictions remain invariant in counterfactual worlds where sensitive attributes are altered. However, most existing methods assume that all observed variables are directly influenced by sensitive attributes, an overly strong and often unrealistic assumption in real-world graphs. To address this limitation, we propose Graph Counterfactual Fairness (GCFair), a novel framework that achieves counterfactual fairness by explicitly identifying and disentangling the subsets of node features and graph structures genuinely affected by sensitive attributes. This principled joint disentanglement enables the generation of authentic counterfactual instances that selectively modify only sensitive-related information while preserving all sensitive-irrelevant factors. Extensive experiments show that GCFair effectively mitigates bias and outperforms state-of-the-art fairness methods in both counterfactual fairness and predictive accuracy.
The proposed Long-term Fairness-aware Recommendation via Adaptive Fairness Metric Selection (LFR-via-AFMS) adaptively selects the most appropriate fairness criterion: Equal Opportunity for true causality, and Demographic Parity for spurious correlations, which eliminates unjustified disparities entirely.
This study explores the potential of counterfactual explanations to assess artificial intelligence (AI) fairness, especially in critical decision-making systems. Predictive models may amplify biases inherent in data sets or algorithms, and given the absence of a universally accepted fairness metric, a case-specific app...
Federico Sabbatini, Roberta Calegari· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly applied to socially consequential tasks, such as disease surveillance on contact graphs, and credit scoring and fraud detection on financial transaction networks. In these settings, biased or unfair predictions can restrict access to opportunities and resources, while priva...
Jing-Yan Zhang, Irina Tal· Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM...· 0 citations
It is argued that current FSD approaches fail to substantively improve fairness but increase the social autonomy of model owners, shielding them from accountability, and it is established that implementing algorithmic fairness requires following normative commitments and accepting real-world sacrifices beyond technical...
Mykhailo Bogachov· Big Data & Society· 0 citations
Over the past decade, Machine Learning (ML) has been trained under dual objectives: minimizing prediction error via Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) while controlling unfairness bias. In practice, however, fairness-aware training often yields limited improvements over standard ERM, making reliable post hoc auditing es...
It is formally proved that GNN architectures lacking spectral expressiveness impose strict constraints on the representation space, so that harmful linear correlations between sensitive attributes and target prediction logits are preserved whenever a low-expressive backbone is paired with a debiasing operator acting wi...
Ming-Qi Yang, Zhao-Yu Liu· ACM Transactions on Knowledg...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.