Skip to content

Stable and Counterfactually Robust Physical World Models from Imposed Structure and Learned Physics

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 26 references
Computer Science

Abstract

A world model learns to forecast how a physical system evolves from recorded trajectories, yet the systems it imitates obey physical laws that are neither fully supplied nor reliably respected. The model may create energy, drift or diverge over long rollouts, and answer a changed law query using the law observed during training. We ask how much general physical structure must be hard coded into a world model, and how much system-specific physics can then be learned from data, for four properties to hold simultaneously: second law compatible dissipation, correct responses to interventions on physical parameters, stability out to one hundred times the training horizon, and robustness to disturbances. The imposed structure is general: dynamics are generated from the gradient of a learned energy through a fixed reversible operator, the energy is restricted to a confining class, a one way port can remove energy but never inject it, the drive channel is known, and the intervened parameter enters through a separable map. The model learns the energy functional, constitutive relations, dissipation rate, and couplings. Across an electromagnetic cavity, a particle in cell grid, and a shallow-water fluid, models with roughly nine thousand parameters recover constitutive functions with unit slope, separate conserving from dissipating worlds by four orders of magnitude using a single set of weights, and transfer changes in sign, magnitude, rate, and gravity to unseen values, where equal-capacity models without the same structure perform at chance or worse. A nonlinear constitutive law is recovered with its curvature preserved and predicts a held-out intervention $2$-$17\times$ better than a converged linear model.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.